Further,
> you're referring to a Baha'i denomination that has knowingly
> based in its claim to authority on a fraudulent will and testament,
LOL. The Remeyites don't question the authenticity of the Will and
Testament!
Consider that Judge Valente,
> of the Supreme Court of New York in no uncertain terms ruled
> against them in their lawsuit against Sohrab and Chanler, pointing
> out the word Bahai was a generic term that couldn't not be
> copyrighted or monopolized by one denomination. Time went by,
> everyone was looking in a different direction. They took out another
> bogus copyright with the patent office, adding diacritics and an
> apostrophe, but none the less the same game.
Once again, you are forgetting that it was the Remeyites themselves
which brought the NSA to court and accused us of traderight
infringment. The current case was marely at attempt to enforce the
decision which came out of that lawsuit.
Methinks Freddies just scared they will go after him next.
.. If they appeal
> Judge St. Eve's ruling, which they probably will, all the better,
> because your damages will be all the more undeniable to
> another judge, or, preferably, a jury.
Don't think they can. I think the only option they have now would be
to go after each organization individually who is guilty of trademark
infringement.
> That's my view.
Translation: Please sue them before they sue me.
There are plenty of religious organizations in the US who use
trademarks to protect their identity. This is nothing unusual by
this.
|
