On Thu, 15 May 2008 12:45:44 -0400, Attuarii <chattengau@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>Culchie Aspirant wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 12 May 2008 12:56:31 -0400, Attuarii <chattengau@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Culchie Aspirant wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 11 May 2008 20:00:40 -0400, Attuarii
<chattengau@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I haven't gotten too far into this, but it promises to be
entertaining
>>>>>reading. And damned if Heinz ain't smack dab in the middle of it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Category: News & Opinion (General) Topic: Crime & Corruption
>>>>> Synopsis:
>>>>> Source: rense.com
>>>>> Published: May 9, 2008 Author: Eustice Mullins
>>>>> For Education and Discussion Only. Not for Commercial Use.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Many American conservatives believe as a matter of faith that the
>>>>>Rockefellers and the Council on Foreign Relations exercise absolute
>>>>>control over the government and the people of United States . This
>>>>>thesis can be accepted as a working formula if one remains conscious
of
>>>>>the larger issues . Two writers for whom the present writer has great
>>>>>respect, Dr. Emanuel Josephson and Morris Bealle, insisted on
focusing
>>>>>on the Rockefellers and excluding all other aspects of the World
Order .
>>>>>This severely limited the effect of their otherwise ground breaking
work
>>>>>on the Medical Monopoly.
>>>>>
>>>>>This writer advanced a contrary view in "The World Order," fixing
upon
>>>>>the Rothschild monetary power, which reached a point of world control
by
>>>>>1885, and its London policy group, the Royal Institute of
International
>>>>>Affairs, a the policy makers for what has essentially been since
1900,
>>>>>re-established colonial government in the United States The colonial,
or
>>>>>occupation, government, functions primarily through the Council on
>>>>>Foreign Relations, but only as the subsidiary of RIIA and through the
>>>>>Rockefeller Foundation which controls government functions, the
>>>>>educational establishments, the media, the religions and the state
>>>>>legislatures.
>>>>>
>>>>>It is true that the American colonials have "free elections", in
which
>>>>>they have the absolute right to vote for one of two opposing
candidates,
>>>>>both of whom have been handpicked and financed by the Rockefeller
>>>>>syndicate . This touching evidence of "democracy" serves to convince
>>>>>most Americana that we are indeed a free people . We even have a
cracked
>>>>>Liberty Bell in Philadelphia to prove it . American youth have been
free
>>>>>since 1900 to be marched off to die in Hegelian wars
>>>>
>>>> Hegelian wars?
>>>>
>>>> I know who Hegel was but in what way were WWI and WWII Hegelian?
>>>>
>>>> Nik
>>>
>>>My interpretation is that Mullins intended that the wars were
>>>intentionally
>>>orchestrated in the sense of a false Hegelian dialectic. I haven't
read a
>>>lot of Hegel, but from what I gather, his philosophical framework as
been
>>>abused by others to imply that he favored the creation of opposing
>>>factions
>>>for the sake of conflict. My interpretation is that Hegel merely
>>>described what he believe to be a natural tendency of human
populations.
>>
>> I get you now...but the 'created for the sake of it' bit is beyond the
>> scope of what Hegel was saying though.
>>
>> Thesis + Anti-Thesis => Synthesis
>>
>> Nik
>
>Well, yes. That's how I too see things. For some reason, people have
>perverted that simple formula into the problem-reaction-solution method
of
>sociopolitical manipulation.
It is implied, I think, in the pages of The Prince by Machiavelli...
Nik
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com
The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+
Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=----
|
