On Apr 9, 8:34 pm, bowman <bow...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> scottlowt...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > Snort. Especially ironic given that you think Obama's a centrist, when
> > he clearly is *not.*
>
> Overall, I don't see a lot of product differentiation between any of the
> three if you look beyond the campaign rhetoric.
Really? Take a look at earmarks. Specifically, how many each have
called for their districts in their time in the Senate.
> Kucinich and Paul both got
> shunted off into oblivion, both of which didn't hew to the centerline.
Both of which were loons.
> After you get past what might have been to what is, what are the
choices?
> Amnesty McCain, the financial genius? Billary, who doesn't even seem to
be
> able to run a campaign?
Granted, the options this time *really* suck. Cthulhu is likely to get
an increased percentage this year. But the fac tthat McCain is
mediocre at best does not mean that Obama is something that he's
not... namely, even remotely qualified, or up to even the low ethical
standards expected of Presidents.
|
