Krislantijn wrote:
> On 30 mrt, 02:00, Libertarius <Libertar...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>>Krislantijn wrote:
>>
>>>On 21 mrt, 18:41, Gabriel <gabriel_bapt...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>>>>The embryo does not have the written word of God, or the life of
>>>>Jesus Christ, the Son of God, either.
>>
>>>Why do you think so? The word of God is always present in the soul, it
>>>doesn't belong to the body, nor is it depending on it.
>>
>>===>What "soul"?
>>You can no more show evidence of a "soul" than evidence of a "god".
>>Both are religious fantasy. -- L.
>>
>>--
>>Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>
>
> Your concept of 'evidence' is limited to evidence pertaining to direct
> sense perception.
===>FALSE.
I aso accept evidence from the telescope, the microscope,
and other reliable instriments.
Therefore, you cannot expect to know anything which
> goes beyond it. The soul cannot be 'seen' by the material senses.
===>The "soul" cannot be seen by any senses because it is NON-SENSE!
>
> Jesus said: "I will give you what no eye has ever seen, what no ear
> has ever heard, what no hand has ever touched and what never came up
> in men's mind."
===>There never was such a person. What you read is just Church
propaganda.
Science and technology can "give you" what "no hand has ever touched and
what never came up in men's mind" at the time the Bibe was written.
But nothing can give you proof a any "soul".
>
> When will he give it? As soon as one follows his instructions and
> fully surrenders unto him.
===>You are asking for a surrender to ignorance.
Higher knowledge cannot be taken, it is
> received.
===>Your "higher knowledge" is just a belief in fantasy. -- L.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
