On Tue, 6 May 2008 21:51:40 -0700 (PDT), "Peter H.M. Brooks"
<Peter.H.M.Brooks@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On May 6, 9:50 pm, "Jenicek" <Jeni...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> And I bet you will start shouting again, if the church start condemning
>> reverse race discrimination at present in full speed in SA!
>>
>I don't think that it is accurate to call Black Executive Enrichment
>and the Ethnic Cleansing of the Workplace 'reverse' race
>discrimination - they are direct racial discriminiation. Denying
>somebody a job that he is qualified for simply because of the colour
>of his skin is, and always has been, racial discrimination and it is
>wrong.
You need to get your terms straight. It's Black Elite Enrichment.
>It was also strange to meet coloured nurses in New Zealand, senior
>nurses, actually, who had also left because of racial discrimination.
>It isn't quite so easy for coloured people, since they are also
>'previously disadvantaged' [as the phrase has it], but not
>sufficiently 'previously disadvantaged' to benefit from the racism.
The advantage of using weasel words like "previously disadvantaged" is
that
they can be used to cover the presently advantaged and make them sound
hard
done by, while ignoring the plight of the currently disadvantaged, black
and
white.
--
Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
Web: http://hayesfam.bravehost.com/stevesig.htm
Blog: http://methodius.blogspot.com
E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop
uk
|
