"Carl" <saints@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:g0q4sk$9el$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The following is an article by John Ankerberg & John Weldon explaining
the
> Biblical doctrine of the Holy Trinity.
>
The ONLY direct reference in the Bible to the "Holy Trinity" is as part of
the label of the 666-Beast, which represents trinity-believing
Christendom.
"Three gods, yet one god" is the same as 666: three numbers, yet one
number.
The Bible calls Jesus Christ God's SON so many times it is clear there is
no
trinity. Everybody knows a SON is not equal to a father and while the
Father can be said to have no beginning, you cannot say that about the
son.
Anyway, I found it interesting that Sir Isaac Newton didn't believe in the
trinity!! He was a follower of Arian, who also did not believe in the
trinity.
Ironically, in true practice among Catholics, the Trinity is God, Mary and
Christ, only there are more images of the pagan Mother Goddess substitute
as
Mary than I think of either Jesus and certainly of God himself, which I
don't think there is any real image. Mary loosely links with Holy Spirit
to become the third member of the pagan trinity.
The fact that the Christendom beast is labelled with the trinity formula
of
666 proves it would be a very, very profound and dominant false doctrine
in
the world of Christendom and it certainly is.
So the "Holy Trinity" is referenced in the Bible after all, it is
recognized
as a dominant false teaching among Christendom and becomes part of the
number of the beast: 666.
In the meantime, there is no way a Father and Son can be said to be equal,
so the trinity doctrine is rejected by many others based on that.
Lars
|
