Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Religion > Christnet > Re: THE PROBLEM...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 21246 of 21842
Post > Topic >>

Re: THE PROBLEM WITH ADAM?

by Risto Karttunen <tipsu@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 14, 2008 at 03:14 AM

Merlin wrote:
> Risto Karttunen wrote:
> >
> > I don't deny that something positive could be seen in the original sin
> > itself.
>
> why do you see it as sin, when it had nothing to do with you.
>
"Sin" is the word for this phenomenon we have discussed and which has
much to do with me.
>
> > which I consider quite harmful in this context.
>
> then why all the negative arguments?  which place you on side or the
> other?
>
What negative arguments? I am not necessarily on any "side".
>
> > I would like to see the
> > original sin as a capability which isn't inherently _bad_.
>
> it isn't true.
>
What isn't true: sin is a capability or it isn't inherently bad?
>
> there is no patient zero for hiv.
> there is no patient zero for sin.
> there is no time when we could not have become who we are.
> there is nothing wrong with wishful thinking.
>
Yes, there is nothing wrong with wishful thinking, so...?
>
> (...)
> > secretly be _proud_ of what He has created in man.
>
> it isn't a secret.  it is something everyone can know.  personally.
>
That was about God. It is not written in the Bible that He was proud,
but I think He was, as any loving parent would have been.
>
> > Every parent whose
> > child does something unexpected, dangerous and extravagant is proud,
> > but perhaps also worried, and the child may be reprimanded and
> > punished, of course.
>
> again, you go negative.
>
How so?
>
> have you been or seen too much punishment in your life?
>
Not too much, no.
>
> > I'd say evil is something which is immoral.
>
> then evil is something you would not do.
>
I wouldn't know. Perhaps St. Paul was right about this and Aristotle
was wrong, for example.
>
> while evil you do not do may be good for some else?
>
Give me an example, please.
>
> we see chrsitians all the time denying others prescription rights.
>
_Prescription_ rights? Who are "we" and who are those Christians? I am
a Finn; you seem to be talking about something which is taking place
in America.
>
> so the christian sees immorality where there is none.
> the christian sees evil where there is none.
>
I guess some Christians do.
>
> (...) and we have christians
> today telling us how evil people are that are not evil, just not
> interested in ba****ng gays like many christians are./
>
Do some American Christians really say that it is evil not to be
interested in ba****ng gays? I am sorry if that really is the case; I
am a Christian and I certainly do not say that. (I don't know English
very well; shouldn't the first letters in "American" and "Christian"
be capitals?).
>
> > For example, it is evil to
> > treat other people as means rather than ends, as Kant said.
>
> that is all humans do.
>
We are sinners, yes.
>
> jesus supposed death is being taken advantage by every christian that
> says jesus died for memememememe.
>
That "advantage" is not what Kant meant.
>
> > > is saying god in hindi evil to you?
>
> > I don't understand your question.
>
> many english speaking christians refuse to allow the name of god in
> any language other than english.
>
I am surprised to hear that. The Bible was not written in English.
>
> it was a generic question about culture supresitition and racism in
> european christianity, where a jewish carpenter is always played by a
> southern italian.
>
Always? In movies etc? And exactly where would the racism be, even if
that was true?
>
> > I am a Finn.
>
> then do you allow god to be addressed in other language.
>
What a strange question indeed. Of course I don't insist that all
people in the world should use the word "Jumala" (the Finnish word for
God).
>
> > Trivially I call a thing evil only if I consider it to be evil (to me
> > or to somebody else).
>
> that isn't good enough.
>
What do you mean?
>
> where does your consciousness lie?
> where do you put your faith in your soul?
> where do you see your inner residing?
> this isn't philosophical this is a real question,
> it is where we place our love our soul or connection with god.
>
Are you asking whether I consider my consciousness etc. to be
spatially located or not?
>
> > At least I admit that there is much we don't know yet.
>
> as you label the unknown to you as evil?
>
I have said nothing like that. Of course I don't think that unknown
logical, physical, historical etc. facts are _evil_.
>
> > Perhaps our
> > consciousness is one of the things we will never understand, really.
>
> and that is why so many turn to religion.
>
Very few people turn to religion on the basis of deliberate ponderings
upon consciousness, I think. If a person really _turns_ to religion,
the reasons seem to be in some deep psychological crisis, or there has
been no single reason, in case that turn has taken place little by
little.
>
> > > ego is too im****tant, and will always be there.
>
> > In that case we will never find the road back to Eden.
>
> it isn't the second comming of jesus.
> it is us find jesus for the first time and becomming.
>
Now you are preaching about something you don't really _know_, I dare
say.
>
> (...)
> do we even have the power of thought to acomplish anything?
>
We can and do accomplish quite a lot, of course.
>
> > > and how is not an animal fighting over food not using mememememem
(...)
>
> > Huh?
>
> watch animals eat on the discovery channel./
> watch lions catch their food.
> watch birds pick out a fish.
>
Your point being...?
>
> there is a sense of the soul in the choices animals make.
> from nesting to foraging.  it is survival beyond instinct.
>
On what basis do you say that, survival _beyond_ instinct?
>
> > > > We humans are curious.
>
> > > and that some call sin.
>
> > Exactly.
>
> that is what merlin calls being negative rather than neutral about
> life.
>
"Sin" is usually said in the negative sense, of course.
>
> > We teach the fear of the difference between the Good and the Evil?
>
> to unsuspecting children.  that grow up to think you can get pregnant
> from toilet seats.
>
So that was what you meant by teaching _the fear of the difference_
between the Good and the Evil, I see.
>
> you tell us..........  what age do christians in your country out gay
> children in their midst?
>
Most Christians here don't do that at all.
>
> outing children as gay happens all the time by christians in america.
>
Are all Christians really doing that there, all the time?
>
> > > in love with the living gay jesus,
>
> > Gay?
>
> yes do you wor****p a finnish a jesus?
> or do you speak greek?
>
Greek? I don't understand.

--
risto
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
Re: THE PROBLEM WITH ADAM?
Risto Karttunen <tipsu  2008-05-14 03:14:42 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Sun Jul 6 23:38:02 CDT 2008.