Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Religion > Christian Views on Theology > Re: The Second ...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 49 of 51 Topic 11111 of 13027
Post > Topic >>

Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ

by "Fred A Stover" <fredstover7@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 25, 2008 at 08:18 AM

"rogue" <rogue719@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:0c7edc43-158d-4413-90e0-dbf7858b87fe@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Jun 24, 10:42 am, "Fred A Stover" <fredstov...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
>> "rogue" <rogue...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
>>
news:4263208a-906e-4a09-9261-ecd9d1a73523@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> > On Jun 24, 5:30 am, Thom Madura <Tommad...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> Adonis wrote:
>>
>> >> > "Fred A Stover" <fredstov...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> >> >news:ZHp7k.9402$xZ.5521@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> "Adonis" <a...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> >> >>news:tuWdnQDoEfeKcsHVnZ2dnUVZ_rPinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> >> >>> "Fred A Stover" <fredstov...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> >> >>>news:%l57k.2243$LG4.512@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >>>> "rogue" <rogue...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> >>
>>>>news:8a742ad6-8c09-4219-9593-8498af8c9466@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> >> >>>>> On Jun 19, 7:49 pm, "Fred A Stover"
<fredstov...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> >> >>>>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>> "rogue" <rogue...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
>> >>
>>>>>>news:018921a5-28fc-4669-b21b-b7c9b7502615@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> >> >>>>>> > On May 28, 1:19 pm, "Fred A Stover" 
>> >> >>>>>> > <fredstov...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> >> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>> >> "rogue" <rogue...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
>> >> >>>>>>
>>news:f7842e88-856e-4504-8e8f-e206904f7578@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> >> >>>>>> >> > On May 26, 7:52 pm, "Fred A Stover"
>> >> >>>>>> <fredstov...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> "rogue" <rogue...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
>> >> >>>>>>
>>news:518dcdd2-85a9-4481-84a8-a2d8eec25764@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > On May 24, 10:47 pm, "Fred A Stover"
>> >> >>>>>> <fredstov...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> "rogue" <rogue...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
>> >> >>>>>>
>>news:2d68cb05-2d09-4c51-8a07-de42c4257282@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> > On May 24, 3:24 pm, "Fred A Stover"
>> >> >>>>>> <fredstov...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> "rogue" <rogue...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>
>> >> >>>>>>
>>news:2b5a6bc1-e640-4d6b-8697-3946d811b902@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> <continued>
>>
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> DUMASSO
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> > There are seven millennial "days" from the fall

>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> > to
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> the judgment. "Day" one is the day Adam fell
and
>> >> >>>>>> died (Gen
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> 2:17).
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> The
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> day
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> of
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> the Lord, is the seventh "day," and what began

>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> at
>> >> >>>>>> His first
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> coming
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> was
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> the
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> last "days" (Is 2:2, Hos 6:2, Acts 2:17, Heb 
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> 1:2).
>>
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> > JERRY
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> > Ok, let's look at that.
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> > Gen 2:17 But of the tree of the knowledge of
good
>> >> >>>>>> and evil,
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> > thou
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> > shalt
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> > not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest
>> >> >>>>>> thereof thou
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> > shalt
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> > surely die.
>>
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> > A verse from an allegorical story about how
good 
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> > and
>> >> >>>>>> evil >> >> >> >> > came
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> > into
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> > the world, not unlike Pandora's box. 
Interesting
>> >> >>>>>> story, no
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> > truth
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> > to
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> > it and a verse that just tells the authority 
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> > figure
>> >> >>>>>> telling
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> > his
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> > creation that he doesn't want them to eat from 
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> > the
>> >> >>>>>> tree and
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> > know
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> > what
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> > is right from wrong.
>>
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> ROTFL!!!!!!!
>>
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> Your 3rd grade reading level again? 
"Allegorical"
>> >> >>>>>> means you
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> don't
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> have
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> the
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> slightest idea of what the Author is saying, so
you
>> >> >>>>>> have to
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> cobble
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> up
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> your
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> own explanation.
>>
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> > JERRY
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> > Nooooo.  Invest in a dictionary, dumasso. 
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> > Allegorical,
>> >> >>>>>> as in
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> > "allegory," means a made up fable with the intent
of
>> >> >>>>>> making a
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> > lesson.
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> > Cause, that's all the creation story of Genesis 
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> > really
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> > is.
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> > (Quick:
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> > outside of a Harry Potter movie, when did you ever

>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> > see
>> >> >>>>>> a >> >> >> > talking
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> > s****?)  Perhaps if you invest in an education as 
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> > well,
>> >> >>>>>> you >> >> >> > might
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> > see
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> > the point that is currently floating above your
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> > pinhead.
>>
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> I've got a dictionary, Dumasso. And your alleged
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> allegorical
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> interpretation
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> which ignores what is plainly said, conjures up a 
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> fable,
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> and
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> renders
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> it
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> into
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> babble, is what I addressed, not the word
"allegory."
>> >> >>>>>> Your >> >> >> reading
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> inability shows, Dumasso.
>>
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> In addition to your worldly in ability, you are
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> spiritually
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> disabled:
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> 1
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> Cor.
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> 2:14
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>     But the natural man receiveth not the things of 
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> the
>> >> >>>>>> Spirit of
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> God:
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> for
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know 
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> them,
>> >> >>>>>> because
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> they
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> are
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> spiritually discerned.
>>
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> Even if you advanced from your 3rd grade reading
level 
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> to
>> >> >>>>>> a 4th
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> grade
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> level,
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> you still could see what is in scripture.
>>
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> <snip>
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > JERRY
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > I can see that you can throw insults but so far
you're
>> >> >>>>>> pretty weak
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > on
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > making an argument, Fred-O.  Whatsamatter?  Brain
stuck 
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> > in
>> >> >>>>>> stall?
>>
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> I'm sorry you are insulted, but it is a fact that you
are
>> >> >>>>>> reading at
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> the
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> 3rd
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> grade level (its not that uncommon), attending only to 
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> the
>> >> >>>>>> words one
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> sentence at a time. It is in the 4th grade that
attending 
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> to
>> >> >>>>>> the >> >> whole
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> writing and what the author is saying with the words. 
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> You've
>> >> >>>>>> been
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> shown
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> but
>> >> >>>>>> >> >> you still do not see.
>>
>> >> >>>>>> >> > JERRY
>> >> >>>>>> >> > Yeah, Fred-O,  you can't tell the third grade level from

>> >> >>>>>> >> > the
>> >> >>>>>> 5th >> > grade
>> >> >>>>>> >> > level, you are just making your insults as you go along.
>>
>> >> >>>>>> >> Duh....I showed you what can be found in the book when you

>> >> >>>>>> >> look
>> >> >>>>>> at the
>> >> >>>>>> >> Author's concepts and look for references to them
throughout
>> >> >>>>>> the >> Author's
>> >> >>>>>> >> works. Instead of seeing the limitations of your reading, 
>> >> >>>>>> >> which
>> >> >>>>>> is 3rd
>> >> >>>>>> >> grade
>> >> >>>>>> >> level reading, a fact, not name-calling and increasing
your
>> >> >>>>>> reading
>> >> >>>>>> >> ability,
>> >> >>>>>> >> you
>> >> >>>>>> >> refuse because you don't want to see it. It is rational
that
>> >> >>>>>> there is a
>> >> >>>>>> >> first millennial "day" (Gen 2:17), but it is there. It
isn't 
>> >> >>>>>> >> a
>> >> >>>>>> matter >> of
>> >> >>>>>> >> rationalizing it into the text. It is in the text. It is a
>> >> >>>>>> matter of
>> >> >>>>>> >> finding
>> >> >>>>>> >> it.
>>
>> >> >>>>>> > JERRY
>> >> >>>>>> > And I showed multiple verses, in context, to sup****t my
>> >> >>>>>> > argument.
>> >> >>>>>> > Meanwhile you started pulling verses out of your ass to
>> >> >>>>>> > rationalize
>> >> >>>>>> > all kinds of claims that you refuse to back up.
>>
>> >> >>>>>> Your multiple verses were not contextually consistent, the 
>> >> >>>>>> context
>> >> >>>>>> being the
>> >> >>>>>> whole of scripture.
>>
>> >> >>>>> JERRY
>> >> >>>>> In other words, what you have deduced the book is about,
though
>> >> >>>>> it's
>> >> >>>>> not agreed to by any other biblical scholars.
>>
>> >> >>>>>> FRED-O
>> >> >>>>>> And the verses I cited were taken from scripture, not
>> >> >>>>>> pulled out of my ass.
>>
>> >> >>>>> JERRY
>> >> >>>>> Taken from different books about different subjects and used
to
>> >> >>>>> twist
>> >> >>>>> into a viewpoint that is not specified in the text.
>>
>> >> >>>>>> FRED-O
>> >> >>>>>> Again, you exemplify your practice of reading at the
>> >> >>>>>> 3rd grade reading level attending merely to the words in
front 
>> >> >>>>>> of
>> >> >>>>>> you and
>> >> >>>>>> what they say instead of all the words from beginning to end 
>> >> >>>>>> and
>> >> >>>>>> what the
>> >> >>>>>> Author is saying with the words.
>>
>> >> >>>>> JERRY
>> >> >>>>> Fred, we aren't dealing with a book intended for the New York 
>> >> >>>>> Times
>> >> >>>>> Bestseller list crowd here.  We are dealing with an audience
of
>> >> >>>>> very
>> >> >>>>> simple, literal people.  That's the reason Jesus said he spoke

>> >> >>>>> in
>> >> >>>>> parables so that others wouldn't understand.  (Mark 4:9-12) 
>> >> >>>>> Given
>> >> >>>>> that Jesus believed that his simple fables would fly over his
>> >> >>>>> audience's head, why would you assume that what you are
choosing 
>> >> >>>>> to
>> >> >>>>> read into the text is really what is meant?
>>
>> >> >>>> Another example of what else you missed.  It was the blinded
who
>> >> >>>> would not understand: "the natural man receiveth not the things

>> >> >>>> of
>> >> >>>> the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither
can 
>> >> >>>> he
>> >> >>>> know them, because they are spiritually discerned" (1 Cor.
2:14).
>>
>> >> >>> An early attempt to make a believer feel special. Some two 
>> >> >>> thousand
>> >> >>> years later and still god/jesus just va**** ware. In the mean
time
>> >> >>> religious organizations kill, mame, steal, tourture all in the 
>> >> >>> name
>> >> >>> of god.
>>
>> >> >> No, a simple reminder to read beyond what the non-believer can't 
>> >> >> see.
>>
>> >> > It's all there in black and white, unless your using Franks bible,

>> >> > it
>> >> > has red in it. Your statement means that a believer is making the 
>> >> > words
>> >> > mean more than they do.
>>
>> >> I believe they call it "SPIN" today.
>>
>> >> Frank claims that he is backed up by the bible - which of course he
>> >> isn't - so he has to EXPAND it to cover his heresy.
>>
>> > JERRY
>> > well, he's already demonstrated that he's a sloppy reader, both of
the
>> > bible and of other people's posts, and he's also a sloppy coder.
>>
>> > I suspect the longer we go on the more sloppy ol' Fred-O is going to
>> > look until he disappears.
>>
>> It is your 3rd grade reading level which was sloppy, causing you to
miss
>> what is reallly in scripture.
>>
> JERRY
> Yeah, Fred, that's why you called me Roger, your website doesn't work
> properly and you rationalize the problems in the text, cause you are
> making it up as you go.

So you say, but you lie. I don't know why you keep reading scripture at
the 
3rd grade level and complaining when I show you what you miss.

>
> What you *say* isn't as im****tant as what you *show."  So far, you are
> showing that you don't read well, you miss im****tant stuff and you
> don't take the time to do something right.
>
> I'd say that you aren't looking as smart as your ego may think you
> look.

The ego is all yours, as you "show" in your snits.


-- 
His,

More @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 www.selah-tx.net

ho echon ota akoueto                             Preparing the way of the 
Lord
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
  Verily I say unto you, Whosoever
  shall not receive the kingdom of God
  as a little child, he shall not enter therein.
                                            (Mark 10:15)
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

<)))))))><
 




 51 Posts in Topic:
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
rogue <rogue719@[EMAIL  2008-05-17 00:52:05 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
"Fred A Stover"  2008-05-17 14:38:53 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
"Ralph" <mmm  2008-05-17 16:37:49 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
"Mike Painter"   2008-05-17 21:59:49 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
"Fred A Stover"  2008-05-18 01:43:53 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
"Mike Painter"   2008-05-18 14:48:10 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
"Fred A Stover"  2008-05-18 21:46:28 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
"Mike Painter"   2008-05-19 17:51:20 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
"Fred A Stover"  2008-05-19 20:52:11 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
"Fred A Stover"  2008-05-18 01:38:23 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
rogue <rogue719@[EMAIL  2008-05-26 04:41:12 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
rogue <rogue719@[EMAIL  2008-06-01 19:46:35 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
"Ralph" <mmm  2008-06-02 09:08:32 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
rogue <rogue719@[EMAIL  2008-05-22 20:33:17 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
monkfish <monkfish@[EM  2008-05-22 23:56:10 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
"Ralph" <mmm  2008-05-23 08:56:48 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
Thom Madura <Tommadura  2008-05-23 12:33:01 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
monkfish <monkfish@[EM  2008-05-23 17:35:09 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
monkfish <monkfish@[EM  2008-05-23 13:54:01 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
Thom Madura <Tommadura  2008-05-23 11:59:09 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
monkfish <monkfish@[EM  2008-05-23 17:13:03 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
rogue <rogue719@[EMAIL  2008-05-23 19:00:52 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
monkfish <monkfish@[EM  2008-05-23 22:58:30 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
Thom Madura <Tommadura  2008-05-24 08:37:20 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
rogue <rogue719@[EMAIL  2008-05-23 19:03:48 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
monkfish <monkfish@[EM  2008-05-23 23:03:14 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
Thom Madura <Tommadura  2008-05-24 08:49:16 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
monkfish <monkfish@[EM  2008-05-24 16:06:27 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
Roger Pearse <roger.pe  2008-05-28 13:56:18 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
rogue <rogue719@[EMAIL  2008-05-24 05:54:18 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
"Fred A Stover"  2008-05-24 13:49:20 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
"Ralph" <mmm  2008-06-01 16:53:24 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
monkfish <monkfish@[EM  2008-05-24 16:19:09 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
"Ralph" <mmm  2008-06-01 16:56:29 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
monkfish <monkfish@[EM  2008-06-01 23:09:30 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
Thom Madura <Tommadura  2008-06-02 10:04:35 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
monkfish <monkfish@[EM  2008-06-02 13:53:42 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
Thom Madura <Tommadura  2008-06-02 14:55:18 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
monkfish <monkfish@[EM  2008-06-02 21:22:32 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
Thom Madura <Tommadura  2008-06-02 22:11:54 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
monkfish <monkfish@[EM  2008-06-02 23:03:51 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
Thom Madura <Tommadura  2008-06-03 07:08:38 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
monkfish <monkfish@[EM  2008-06-03 17:50:37 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
Thom Madura <Tommadura  2008-06-03 18:34:17 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
monkfish <monkfish@[EM  2008-06-04 13:25:15 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
rogue <rogue719@[EMAIL  2008-05-24 06:03:15 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
"Fred A Stover"  2008-05-24 13:47:58 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
rogue <rogue719@[EMAIL  2008-06-24 03:42:41 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
"Fred A Stover"  2008-06-25 08:18:19 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
rogue <rogue719@[EMAIL  2008-07-24 04:45:26 
Re: The Second Coming Of Jesus Christ
rogue <rogue719@[EMAIL  2008-07-24 05:09:20 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Oct 6 4:32:09 CDT 2008.