Thom Madura wrote:
> monkfish wrote:
>> hhyapster@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>>
>>> On May 25, 12:30 pm, monkfish <monkfish@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>> rogue wrote:
>>>>> On May 24, 8:13 pm, monkfish <monkfish@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>> rogue wrote:
>>>>>>> On May 24, 7:03 am, monkfish <monkfish@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>> rogue wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On May 23, 9:12 pm, monkfish <monkfish@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> rogue wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Perhaps you need to see a doctor about your reading
>>>>>>>>>>> comprehension
>>>>>>>>>>> problems and overall ignorance there, Fred-O. He might
>>>>>>>>>>> prescribe an education followed by some time spent away from
>>>>>>>>>>> superstition. ;-)
>>>>>>>>>> You are extremely rude and self-righteous.
>>>>>>>>> JERRY
>>>>>>>>> I am extremely correct in the things I told him. You, on the
>>>>>>>>> other hand, are extremely stupid masquerading as intelligent.
>>>>>>>>>> monkfish
>>>>>>>>>> Is that the way you are told to behave
>>>>>>>>>> by your ethical system?
>>>>>>>>>> What happened to the principle of reciprocity?
>>>>>>>>> JERRY
>>>>>>>>> When you take Fred to task for his behavior you can attempt to
>>>>>>>>> take me
>>>>>>>>> to task, child. In the meantime, what Fred is receiving IS the
>>>>>>>>> same
>>>>>>>>> as he gave. That, my friend, IS the "ethic of reciprocity."
>>>>>>>> Christians should not call people names.
>>>>>>>> But we sure can ask questions.
>>>>>>>> Are you a hypocrite?
>>>>>>> JERRY
>>>>>>> Who said I'm a Christian?
>>>>>>> As for hypocrites, who said I'm a Christian?
>>>>>> In the name of the principle of reciprocity,
>>>>>> I ask again, "Are you a hypocrite?"
>>>>> JERRY
>>>>> Already asked and answered, Monk.
>>>> Do you really think you are observing the spirit
>>>> of the principle of reciprocity?
>>>>
>>> I find your stand of asking questions interesting.
>>> But I find you to be a great liar who say as a Christian you ask
>>> question.
>>> If you ask questions, how could you defend all the misdeeds of your
>>> god as described in the scripture?
>>> Either you lied, or you don't read your bible, or you ignore the lies
>>> in the bible or you swallow the lies or you are not a human.....
>>
>>
>> All our fault.
>>
>> If God does not exist,
>> it must be all our fault.
>>
>> Even if God exists,
>> it's still all our fault.
>>
>> Do you often blame someone
>> who doesn't even exist
>> in your scheme of things?
>>
>>
>
> So you are admitting that your god is a figment of your imagination.
No.
God appears to be way beyond your comprehension.
Unless you are willing to study ontology for several years,
you really should listen to people who did.
You do trust physicists, don't you?
Even if you don't understand them mathematically?
What makes you think
you can understand ontology without any training?
--
monkfish
* The followup-to header is set to alt.christnet.theology.
** alt.atheism is removed from the groups header.
|
