Re: NO EVIDENCE is sufficient for atheists

Thom Madura wrote:

> monkfish wrote:
>> 
>> If you prove that love exists,
>> you would have proven that God exists.
> 
> Sorry - love can be shown by Pigs for their young - and that does not
> prove a god exists.


Actually you are assuming a little too much about God.
There is no reason to think that God has to exist
in the mode prescribed by human beings.
At most, we can study His revelations.
But once you accept something as a revelation,
you have already accepted His existence.
So, it comes down to whether we have any revelations.
But strangely, anything and everything can be
God's revelation depending on our perspectives.
So, it would be simpler to view Him
as the ultimate point of reference and
as prior to existence.


-- 
monkfish 
* The followup-to header is set to alt.christnet.theology.
** alt.atheism is removed from the groups header.