Re: theology for atheists,alt.christnet.theology,alt.christnet.theology,alt.christnet.theology,alt.christnet.theology,alt.christian.religion,alt.christnet.evangelical,alt.christnet.philosophy,alt.christnet.theology,alt.religion.apologetics,alt.religion.ch

"monkfish" <monkfish@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:cuydnbWzRfbuzq_VnZ2dnUVZ_o7inZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Adions wrote:
>
>>
>> "monkfish" <monkfish@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:Zf6dnQ7vf9e-Ca3VnZ2dnUVZ_gCdnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> bob young wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have yet to see you discuss theology in an intelligent way.
>>>>
>>>> Posting silly obtuse questions is not a discussion.
>>>
>>>
>>> [theology]
>>> My working hypothesis is that
>>> God is the ultimate point of reference.
>>> That means God is even prior to proofs of all kinds.
>>> So, at best, we can hope that God somehow makes sense to us.
>>>
>>> God understood in the traditional Christian way
>>> makes sense to over a billion of people.
>>> But I want God to make sense even to atheists.
>>>
>>> It is my position that
>>> we need God to make sense of anything.
>>> How do you make sense of anything?
>>> [/theology]
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Discussing theology is one thing, to try to use endless questions to
>> create an endless paradox is something else.
>> It would seem by your statements, that you do not partake of the
typical
>> flavor that the usual believer makes god out to be. It also appears
that
>> you discount if not reject the bible.
>
>
> Not quite.
> It just appears that way when I do theology.
>
Just like it only appears you post under the name Mike Hunt. So hows ol
pool?


> I'm doing my best here to help atheists
> make sense out of God and His love.
>
Apparently your not doing a good job, look at all the negative posts aimed
at 
just you.

>
> -- 
> monkfish
> * The followup-to header is set to alt.christnet.theology.
> ** alt.atheism is removed from the groups header.