Go Figure from there.
6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 66 6 6 6 6 6 66 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Are all one short of God so they all are human people one right after the
other.
There is the answer to your riddle.
M,
"martus" <marttila69@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:d5175265-580e-4e8a-9ec5-f042de4804c3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Brain-Computer Interfaces for Manipulating Dreams
>
> Michael Anissimov
> Michael Anissimov
>
>
> Accelerating Future
>
> Posted: Mar 19, 2008
>
>
> A first-generation commercial brain-computer interface (BCI) is being
> released by Emotiv Systems later this year. What does the future hold
> for BCI?
>
> By 2050, and likely sooner, you will be able to buy a BCI device that
> records all your dreams in their entirety. This will be done in one
> of two ways. One method would be to use distributed nanobots less
> than a micrometer in diameter to spread throughout the brain and
> monitor the activation patterns of neurons.
>
>
>
>
>
> By this point, cognitive science will have advanced enough to know
> which neural activation patterns correspond to which sensory
> experiences. This has already been done with cats (using electrodes,
> not nanobots), where researchers led by scientist Garrett Stanley were
> able to extrapolate what a cat was seeing merely by monitoring the
> neurons of its visual cortex. Here are some images they obtained:
>
>
>
>
>
> The next steps will be to increase the resolution, add monitoring of
> emotions, sounds, and smells, and make it safe for human use. An
> alternative route, if nanobots are still not ready for commercial
> deployment by 2050, is to have minimally invasive surgery where tiny
> holes, no larger than a grain of sand, are drilled in the skull.
> Electronic nanofibers could be routed through these holes from a ****t
> on the outside to neurons throughout the brain. The holes could be
> protected by a plastic membrane, ensuring that no foreign particles
> could pass through them into the brain. The access ****ts on the scalp
> would be compatible with a BCI headset designed to monitor activity in
> specific neural groups and selectively stimulate neurons according to
> a program.
>
> A major challenge, of course, would be to get FDA approval for such a
> device. The therapeutic and practical benefits of a high-resolution
> BCI device are so large that if it can be shown not to cause any
> damage or negative side-effects to its user, approval seems likely.
>
> If the BCI device offers input to the brain as well as recording
> output, then dreams could be played back too. A Dream Machine would
> let us show our dreams to others. If we know which neural activation
> pattern corresponds to which perceptions (sight, sounds, etc.), it's
> not a huge leap to selectively stimulate neurons to produce customized
> dream scenarios, or even enter the dreams of others in action. (In
> ascending order of technological difficulty.)
>
> Manipulating our dreams... how many thousands of years has humanity
> waited for this? Here's a frequent kind of background I see in my
> dreams:
>
>
>
>
>
> ...other things I see include gigantic academic complexes, cliff
> networks, green hills overlooking sunny blue bays, and many others.
> I'm sure you can imagine hundreds of scenarios from your dreams, many
> of which seem so fleeting. But it won't necessarily be that way
> forever.
>
> The possible societal effects of a Dream Machine would be immense.
> Dream recordings and recreations would offer an op****tunity to:
>
> 1) Validate or refute Freudian theories about the connections of
> dreams to subconscious or conscious psychological states.
>
> 2) Create a "science of dreams", or oneirology, that organizes all
> available dream data, breaks up dreams into categories, studies which
> type of people get which dreams, etc.
>
> 3) Create a "dream entertainment industry" where people choose to have
> customized dreams, with features like greater visual complexity or
> richness of colors, or even massively multiplayer dreams.
>
> 4) The possible rise of "dream celebrities" -- people who freely upload
> their dreams for others to examine, followed by a positive reception.
> People might lead double lives -- boring accountant by day, world-
> famous lucid dreamer by night. Some people might even get paid for
> their dreams.
>
> 5) Uncover the hidden world of dreams that barely rise above our
> subconscious. People tend to have several dreams per night, but
> remember only one or two. We experience these dreams when they
> happen, our brain just neglects to transfer the information content
> into long-term memory. (The reasons for this are likely evolutionary
> -- we would get confused about reality if we remembered too many of our
> dreams.) Imagine if we could record all these dreams and play them
> back at will. With enough storage density (molecular memory), you
> could even store your dreams on a pendant around your neck.
>
> 6) Convert dream-worlds into real-worlds; amusement parks based on
> dreams, or utility fog banks that quickly morph in response to a given
> personal or collective dreamscape. Or vice versa: turn real world
> places and people into dream objects.
>
> 7) In general, blur the line between dreams and reality by making
> dreams more tangible, manipulable, interactive, customizable, and
> social. Bring dreams "in from the cold". Make dreams as mysterious,
> colorful, productive, foreign, *****c, or mundane as you want them to
> be.
>
> Considering these possibilities, the first thing that makes me nervous
> is that people would institute inappropriate regulations over the use
> of this technology. For instance, some groups of people might hate
> the idea of removing some of the "mystery of dreams" (like how modern
> biology ostensibly dispels some of the mystery of life, or modern
> physics dispels some of the mystery of nature) through technology. As
> someone who is socially liberal, barring sufficiently negative
> externalities, I'd advocate light regulation on this technology.
> Heavy regulation should be saved for more dangerous technologies such
> as synthetic biology and molecular nanotechnology
>
> Possible risks:
>
> 1) If dreams start to be run on servers, hacking or computer viruses
> could be a problem. In most cases, this would likely just result in
> the dream shutting down (not a big deal -- this already happens all the
> time), but if your dream got hijacked, someone could use them to
> threaten or attempt to brainwash you. This is what doubters will
> focus on excessively -- but remember, our brain and body is already
> acceptable to "viruses" -- including real viruses, bacteria, prions,
> and parasites, but we manage to defend against it. Eventually, we
> will develop computers with technological immune systems as complex
> and effective as the human immune system, it will just take time.
> Even if dream-recording BCI devices are possible, dream-manipulating
> BCI devices may have to wait until computer security catches up.
>
> 2) Communication through dreams could make it more difficult for
> parents to control their children, or for regimes to control their
> populations, by opening up the information channels they have access
> to. In this regard, the challenge would be similar to a magnified
> version of the struggles already seen with the Internet in general.
>
> 3) A "delightful dream", so thoroughly enjoyable and amazing that it
> spreads across the world, and all humanity is consumed by it. From
> that point onward, we only develop our civilization for the purpose of
> maintaining this euphoric state, a local maxima in the fitness
> landscape of cultural progress and evolution. This might be a dream
> that involves direct stimulation of the pleasure center. (For this
> reason, it might be good to avoid building BCI devices that directly
> stimulate the pleasure center.) The "delightful dream" scenario would
> be considered a subset of wireheading. It might be more notorious,
> though, because while many people wouldn't stick electrodes into their
> head just to stimulate their pleasure center, they might be willing to
> use a Dream Machine might, which could get them trapped in a wirehead
> when they otherwise would avoid it.
> ____________________________________________________________
>
> 666 in Hebrew looks like a square, a circle and a verticle line (see
> here
>
>
> http://mart1963.tripod.com/docs/04-UNHOLY3.html
(at the bottom of
> that page)
>
>
> and should remind people of a socket which is the direstion
> technology
> is heading, the brain machine interfaces. The clearest signials will
> always be under the skin and in the frontal lobe emotions can be
> controlled with the right electrical signal i.e. instant happiness at
> the switch of a pulse.
>
>
> And then they could not break that addiction to filth as they
> satisfied there lusts as if they were actual doing it as when the
> brain is hooked up with the machine then that what is pumped into the
> brain becomes the reality. The forehead which is the outside of the
> frontal lobes which are the very core center of your emotions and
> your being will not know the difference. Welcome to the Matrix of
> HELL.
>
>
> Revelation 13:16-18 (New International Version)
>
> 16He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and
> slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead, 17so
> that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the
> name of the beast or the number of his name.
>
>
> 18This calls for wisdom. If anyone has insight, let him calculate
> the number of the beast, for it is man's number. His number is 666.
>
>
> Revelation 13:16
> He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and
> slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead,
>
>
> Revelation 13:17
> so that no one could buy or sell unless he had the mark, which is the
> name of the beast or the number of his name.
>
>
> Revelation 14:9
> 9A third angel followed them and said in a loud voice: "If anyone
> wor****ps the beast and his image and receives his mark on the
> forehead or on the hand, 10he, too, will drink of the wine of God's
> fury,
> which has been poured full strength into the cup of his wrath. He will
> be
> tormented with burning sulfur in the presence of the holy angels and
> of the Lamb.
>
>
> Revelation 14:11
> And the smoke of their torment rises for ever and ever. There is no
> rest day or night for those who wor****p the beast and his image, or
> for anyone who receives the mark of his name."
>
>
> 2 Timothy 3
> Godlessness in the Last Days
> 1But mark this: There will be terrible times in the last days.
> 2People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful,
> proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy,
> 3without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal,
> not lovers of the good, 4treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of
> pleasure rather than lovers of God-- 5having a form of godliness but
> denying its power. Have nothing to do with them.
>
>
>
|
