On May 11, 5:28 pm, "Chuck Stamford" <shell__stamf...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Agent Haskell, IRS" <fatherhask...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
messagenews:73631987-9f75-483b-b436-dbe5b1278d6d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> > On May 11, 1:53 pm, "Chuck Stamford" <shell__stamf...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> "Agent Haskell, IRS" <fatherhask...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
> >>
messagenews:817491ae-6d5f-417c-b11f-b7eaf3e37842@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> > On May 11, 2:55 am, "Chuck Stamford" <shell__stamf...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>
> >> >> If anything, I think science has shown it's possible to make a
whole
> >> >> new
> >> >> person out of the tissue of another; that it doesn't even require
a
> >> >> miracle.
>
> >> > It requires an aseptic lab environment. Extraction of the
> >> > donor DNA requires a microscope. The clone itself is an
> >> > exact duplicate of the donor, meaning the same ***.
>
> >> Thank you for belaboring the obvious.
>
> > The obvious what?
>
> Trouble reading your own posts?
Struck a nerve?
|
