Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Religion > Christian Philosophy > Re: NO EVIDENCE...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 14 of 19 Topic 5293 of 5546
Post > Topic >>

Re: NO EVIDENCE is sufficient for atheists

by bob young <alaspectrum@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 24, 2008 at 09:50 PM

Pastor Frank wrote:
> 
> "bob young" <alaspectrum@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:483536A6.C288221F@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Pastor Frank wrote:
> >> "bob young" <alaspectrum@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >> news:4832387E.FF051DEF@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> > Thom Madura wrote:
> >> >> Pastor Frank wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >    Those rescue workers represent our God, in that they do good
> >> >> > works.
> >> >> > You still labour under the illusion, that the word "god" means
some
> >> >> > invisible ogre in the sky, behind them thar clouds, much like
your
> >> >> > grand-pappy believed. Talk about "primitive" Bob, you take the
> >> >> > prize.
> >> >>
> >> >> I am sorry but you are misled.
> >> >> People are capable of doing good works even when they don't
believe in
> >> >> a
> >> >> god. People did good things before religion invented their gods -
the
> >> >> greeks did good works - even though you do not believe their
> >> >> mythology.
> >> >> The romans did good works - even before they recognized
Catholicism.
> >> >> The only US president that never belonged to a religion in his
> >> >> lifetime
> >> >> freed the slaves =- and was considered a very moral man - Lincoln.
> >> >> The reason for doing good is that it is the right thing to do -
and it
> >> >> should not be because of fear of eternal punishment. We do not
need
> >> >> religion to determine what the right thing to do is. Nor the wrong
> >> >> thing
> >> >> - although they are a good example for that.
> >> >
> >> > Frank's religion is 'power'.  'Power for Frank' and he's not
> >> > alone by any stretch of the imagination !
> >> >
> >>    Who would determines what is the right thing to do?  The right
thing
> >> to
> >> do for some is to kill people, for others the right thing is to is to
> >> save
> >> people from being killed.  With Jesus the right thing to do, is to
never
> >> harm anyone.
> >
> > Yes and the Inquisition again springs to mind
> >
>     That remark is about as "primitive" and simple-minded as you can
get.
> Show where Christ commands anything like an "inquisition". Even to the
most
> simple-minded it's obvious that those who called themselves Christians,
yet
> did the opposite from what Christ commanded, were not Christians at all,
but
> evil liars, impostors and criminals, yet you believe them. See below the
> commandments of Christ.

Look it up.  All of Europe, France, Spain, Italy, Germany. 
It was a mental disease born of fear, 
the place your love comes from.
> 
> Pastor Frank
> 
>      Jesus in Jn:13:34: A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love
one
> another; as I have loved you, that ye also love one another.
>     Jesus in Jn:13:35: By this shall all men know that ye are my
disciples,
> if ye have love one to another.
>     Jesus in Jn:15:12-13: This is my commandment: That ye love one
another,
> as I have loved you. Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay
down
> his life for his friends.
>
 




 19 Posts in Topic:
Re: NO EVIDENCE is sufficient for atheists
"Pastor Frank"   2008-05-18 16:08:51 
Re: NO EVIDENCE is sufficient for atheists
bob young <alaspectrum  2008-05-18 23:51:02 
Re: NO EVIDENCE is sufficient for atheists
"Pastor Frank"   2008-05-19 12:04:09 
Re: NO EVIDENCE is sufficient for atheists
Thom Madura <Tommadura  2008-05-19 14:02:12 
Re: NO EVIDENCE is sufficient for atheists
monkfish <monkfish@[EM  2008-05-19 14:31:54 
Re: NO EVIDENCE is sufficient for atheists
"Pastor Frank"   2008-05-20 03:06:42 
Re: NO EVIDENCE is sufficient for atheists
Thom Madura <Tommadura  2008-05-21 21:57:02 
Re: NO EVIDENCE is sufficient for atheists
monkfish <monkfish@[EM  2008-05-21 23:43:13 
Re: NO EVIDENCE is sufficient for atheists
bob young <alaspectrum  2008-05-19 21:39:03 
Re: NO EVIDENCE is sufficient for atheists
"Pastor Frank"   2008-05-20 02:23:23 
Re: NO EVIDENCE is sufficient for atheists
Richard Anacker <spam.  2008-05-21 13:29:25 
Re: NO EVIDENCE is sufficient for atheists
bob young <alaspectrum  2008-05-22 04:08:01 
Re: NO EVIDENCE is sufficient for atheists
"Pastor Frank"   2008-05-23 22:45:43 
Re: NO EVIDENCE is sufficient for atheists
bob young <alaspectrum  2008-05-24 21:50:02 
Re: NO EVIDENCE is sufficient for atheists
"Cj" <Cj@[EM  2008-05-25 02:27:23 
Re: NO EVIDENCE is sufficient for atheists
"Pastor Frank"   2008-05-25 18:18:23 
Re: NO EVIDENCE is sufficient for atheists
"Cj" <Cj@[EM  2008-05-25 21:34:54 
Re: NO EVIDENCE is sufficient for atheists
bob young <alaspectrum  2008-05-26 04:46:05 
Re: NO EVIDENCE is sufficient for atheists
bob young <alaspectrum  2008-05-19 21:37:02 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Sat Aug 30 1:49:13 CDT 2008.