"Thom Madura" <Tommadura@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:48303162$0$15164$607ed4bc@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Pastor Frank wrote:
>> "Adonis" <zerocalories@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>> news:KoqdnclfR9AEyLPVnZ2dnUVZ_oHinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> "punktdawg" <punktdawg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>
news:e1e57fc5-4875-414b-bc95-ff1693573b17@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>> Let your voice be heard on the sanctity of marriage, please vote No
on
>>>> this poll:
>>>>
http://ktla.trb.com/news/local/eveningnews/ktla-primenews-poll,0,4116652.special
>>>
>>> Why vote no? Why should you care if two people of the same *** marry,
>>> how does it affect you? You live your life, let others live theirs.
>> I think that excuse has already worn thin, by those who justify
their
>> having *** with their consenting adult close same-*** relatives, i.e.
mom
>> and/or dad and among siblings.
>
> Not - ***** is not the same thing - make a valid argument why the
> government should not recognize the union of ANY two people as marriage
-
> when it is not a biological concern anyway.
>
>> It's sad, that 2 people of the same *** can't bunk together anymore,
>> without one of them running the risk of the other claiming conjugal
>> rights after 6 months cohabitation and the eligibility to take half of
>> what the other one owns, ....and getting it in court.
>
> So - we should outlaw marriage completely then - for all - is what you
are
> saying.
>
An apologist for marriage fraud? How droll!!!
|
