monkfish wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2008 00:51:41 -0400, Fred Jones wrote:
>
> > "monkfish" <monkfish@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> >>
> >> Is God real?
> > No
> >> Have you seen all the churches and books dedicated to God?
> > yes I have, I own quite a few.
> >> Do you know how many people are wor****ping God?
> >>
> > In lip service or really in wor****p?
> >
> >> Is money real?
> >
> > Do you buy and sell?
> >
> >> How do you even prove that money exist?
> >
> > A lot easier to do so than your god.
> >
> >> Do you look at how transaction works?
> >>
> >>
> > Every day.
> >
> >> Are you blind?
> >
> > No, but I do wear gl*****.
> >
> >> Can't you see how God works in everything?
> >
> > No, but I see a lot of people saying they do. So what did god have to
do
> > with the 36 shootings, 9 homicides re****ted in Chicago over the
weekend?
> >
> >> Yes, everything!
> >>
> > God works in every thing? So it was behind the holocaust!
> >
> >
> >> Hold up anything whatsoever in this world, and open your eyes to see
> >> God.
> >
> > Well quite frankly, I don't see a lot of god in world wide pollution.
> > The beheadings in Iraq. The 9/11 attacks. The sinking of the titanic.
I
> > could go on but whats the point?
> >
> >> God is the ultimate point of reference.
> >
> > To what?
> >
> >> God makes money useful.
> >
> > No it does that all by it self. What ever is considered of value at
the
> > time humans will use it for transaction.
> >
> >> God turns papers into money.
> >
> > No that would be factories and very large printing presses.
> >
> >> Not government, not Mammon.
> >
> > Do vampires exist?
> > If your god is so real, way aren't the gods of ancient Egypt real?
> >
>
> A very good question.
> How do we distinguish God from idols?
How do you distinguish between brain damaged people and sane ones?
>
> How do we distinguish the real love from the fake one?
>
> --
> monkfish * alt.atheism is removed from the header
> because atheists there consider quoting the Bible proselytizing
> and as such it is prohibited by their undebatable policy.
|
