On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 20:44:22 -0400, Fred Jones wrote:
> "monkfish" <monkfish@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:lcOdnQp8vdjcmYjVnZ2dnUVZ_rHinZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 00:33:12 -0400, Fred Jones wrote:
>>
>>> "monkfish" <monkfish@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:JLydndC_goSiYI7VnZ2dnUVZ_h7inZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 23:17:03 -0400, Fred Jones wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "monkfish" <monkfish@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>> news:JLydnaG_goSKd47VnZ2dnUVZ_h7inZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>> On Sat, 26 Apr 2008 21:52:14 -0400, Fred Jones wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Pastor Frank" <PF@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>It's the God who lays down His innocent life for me, because He
>>>>>>>>loves me, ...to the death if need be.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's a good thing he would then, I doubt you would.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Who loves YOU to the death if need be, and whom do YOU love to
>>>>>>>> the death if need be?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My wife and children.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Good for you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What does it mean for you to love them so much? What does it mean
>>>>>> for your love for them to exist? Can you prove that such love
>>>>>> exists?
>>>>>>
>>>>> Can you prove a paradoxical question can prove the existence of god?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No.
>>>>
>>>> God is prior to proof.
>>>> God is what makes proof possible.
>>>>
>>>> If you want something more traditional, you might be interested in
>>>> God as Logos.
>>>
>>> God claims in the bible that proof is in the works of his people.
>>
>>
>> Sure, but you are not ready for God-talk yet. You cannot laugh at God
>> and understand Him.
>
> No need to, I see the pudding, it is rotten.
>
On the other hand, it is said that
you cannot laugh and be sad at the same time.
How serious are you about God?
--
monkfish * alt.atheism is removed from the header
because atheists there consider quoting the Bible proselytizing
and as such it is prohibited by their undebatable policy.
|
