"Bill M" <wmech@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:dcKVj.61709$%15.28217@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Andrew" <thecroft@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:2008051121471975249-thecroft@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> On 2008-05-11 15:50:57 +0100, "Bill M" <wmech@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> said:
>>> "Andrew" <thecroft@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>> news:2008051116015916807-thecroft@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> On 2008-05-10 20:23:27 +0100, "Bill M" <wmech@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> said:
>>>>
>>>>> This is both an invitation and a challenge to religionists to
provide
>>>>> objective verifiable evidence that there is some REAL God that we
need
>>>>> to cater to.
>>>>
>>>> As soon as you supply us with a description of what you understand by
>>>> the word 'God' we'll be in a position to see if there are any facts
>>>> that would
>>>> would suffice as evidence for its existence. Until then any facts we
>>>> advance can just be waved airily aside by yourself.
>>>
>>> How about Jesus, Allah ot any the other hundreds of claimed claimed
>>> Gods?
>>> Pick anyone you like.
>>
>> Objective verifiable evidence for the existence of Jesus can be found
in
>> the books of the New Testament, the extra-biblical letters and other
>> do***ents and the very existence of the Christian church. Whether he
was
>> God or not is another matter.
>
> No this is just unauthenticated opinion - nothing more.
> Why do you post this drivel???
>
You forgot to post your "authenticated" opinion. Yes Bill, let's see
you
actually back up your assertions, or "drivel" and quote authoritative
sources,
