Athena wrote:
> On Fri, 9 May 2008 15:11:25 -0500, Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote
> (in message
> <c3a68bd0-137a-41db-acb8-b82654495a3e@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):
>
>> Athena wrote:
>>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>>> convicted friend monkfish wrote:
>>>>> satan via a sockpuppet (cor****eal demon) despairingly posted:
>>>>>> <whine whine whine>
>> http://HeartMDPhD.com/Whinersatan
>>
>>>>> Incredible.
>>>>> You actually managed to get banned by Google?
>>>>> What is more incedable is that
>>>>> you are not repentant at all.
>>> That is no way for DejaVuSr to be talking about his son, DejaVuJr
>> Actually, satan is noone's son but rather simply the source of all
>> lies:
>
> Since my comment was about you, DejaVuSr and monkfish, DejaVuJr, it
seems
> that you view monkfish, DejaVuJr, your son, to be Satan. However in the
> previous post you said "Monkfish is at the moment infinitely better off
than
> either satan ..." So you view monkfish to be Satan and yet monkfish is
> better off than Satan.
Actually he is using the term satan to indicate varying degrees
of evil in the persons character, and speaking at that evil,
not to the person. Once that person allows such a destructive force
to dominate their thoughts they are generally thought to be
unreachable, and as life takes this turn it is also a given
that you may know someone like this. There are many on the net
that are like that with no remorse for the harm their words can cause,
because they do not recognize the harm they are causing, seeing
it as great fun.
Hence they are considered a "satan", or evil if you prefer.,but it
does exist and those giving in to it are simply to involved in their
own actions to see what it does to them.
Rod
|
