Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Religion > Christian Ethics > Re: Homo***uali...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 5 of 5 Topic 1621 of 1716
Post > Topic >>

Re: Homo***uality. The cause and cure.

by "Pastor Frank" <PF@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Dec 28, 2007 at 04:20 PM

"Willy" <willyk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:jY8dj.59428$eY.29530@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Pastor Frank" <PF@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
> news:47737212$0$26099$88260bb3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> "Willy" <willyk@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>> news:T4xcj.34850$Pv2.8435@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> "Pastor Frank" <PF@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
>>> news:476f9b40$0$26116$88260bb3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>> "**Rowland Croucher**" <rccroucher@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in 
>>>> message news:476e3c99$0$7238$afc38c87@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>
>>>>> For the record, I am an active/exclusive hetero***ual. I believe
that 
>>>>> (a) God intended marriage between a male and a female to be the norm

>>>>> for humans, but (b) the vast majority of homo***uals - if not all of

>>>>> them - did not choose their orientation, and (c) they have a right
to 
>>>>> be treated as precious human beings created in the image of God like

>>>>> the rest of us.
>>>>>
>>>>    That's is living with obesity because hunger is natural. If we 
>>>> thought like that of ANY aberrant behaviour, then no cure would ever
be 
>>>> found for anything. The question should be: Why does homo***uality 
>>>> occur, and is there a prevention possible and/or desirable? Perhaps
we 
>>>> should encourage homo***uality to prevent overpopulation? Then what 
>>>> produces the maximum results?
>>>>    Considering, that homo***uality is rare among the poor and 
>>>> primitive, it is obviously a cultural phenomena. When we ask
ourselves 
>>>> what cultural phenomena that might be, then it must be one, that is 
>>>> uncommon among the poor and primitive, such children sleeping alone. 
>>>> Look at the normal sleeping arrangement among mammals, and you see
the 
>>>> young sleeping touching each other, if not their parents also, and so

>>>> do the children of the poor and primitive. The very young sleeping in

>>>> separate beds, if not also in separate rooms is quite unnatural and 
>>>> apparently prevents them from assuming gender appropriate roles at an

>>>> optimal age, which is probably before the child can talk.
>>>
>>> Wow P Frank:  I've NEVER heard of this theory, and I thought I'd heard

>>> them all.
>>> Is this your speculation alone, or have you seen research to sup****t 
>>> this concept?
>>> If so, I'd be very interested in the source as I'd like to research
the 
>>> thought process further.
>>> Willy
>>>
>>    It's logical deduction, Willy, but could be worth a research grant
to 
>> some scientist. There is another fact for you, that might have a 
>> connection. Zoologists re****t, that Simians (our closest animal 
>> relatives) who grew up in isolation, and never witnessed (were taught) 
>> reproduction by their species in infancy, are unable to reproduce as 
>> adults.
>>    We witness a similar situation in mental institutions, where inmates

>> able to masturbate are most often unable to copulate.
>>    Apparently for normal ***ual function later in life, infants must be

>> wired correctly at an optimal age.
>
> You and I may not agree on this matter, but here's a thought for you.
> While I do believe there is a SMALL number of homo***uals that are born 
> from the womb as such, I tend to believe that 99% of the gay community
are 
> developed by life and social events at a prebuescent (spelling?) age. 
> While I feel this is something that cannot be changed, in that we are
what 
> we are, but unlike the gay community at large, I do not believe we are 
> born (least not commonly) with a predisposal to ***ual tendency in 
> general.
> Here's something for you to think about.  I am a firm believer that most

> homo***uality is a result of a disconnect with the male "father figure"
in 
> the life of the inidividual, and I believe that holds true for both gays

> as well as lesbians.
    I know, that's a popular notion, but if that were true, than
homo***uals 
should abound after a war when a large percentage of males are no longer 
living. And I don't think this is a fact. There is much speculation, but 
little research sup****ted facts.

Having said that, we often hear today that there seems to
> be more "gayness" than ever, and it leads us to wonder why, when
examining 
> history of as little as 50 years ago, we don't see evidence of a similar

> phenomenom.
> I believe the answer is simple.  The divorce rate, as well as the number

> of single mothers (no father figure in the home) raising children the
last 
> 30 years as multiplied more times than any period in history.
>
    We are getting richer and every child has his/her own room. That 
physical closeness that once was so common is no longer there, preventing 
infants ***-tying themselves at the optimum age. Most manage without it,
but 
there are always some who wire themselves the wrong way.

> And the result, more individuals that are socially and permanently 
> conditioned (without any effort on their part) to being gay.  It's
suurely 
> a little more complex than one written sentence, but I have done 
> considerable research over many years and am solidly convinced this is 
> true.
> Honestly I don't agree with the maturbation theory, as I truly feel any 
> and every male on this planet, particularly during puberty and 20's most

> likely participates in this acitivity on a very frequent, perhaps daily 
> basis.  In females it seems to be a little less in frequency, but none
the 
> less a normal function.  I don't believe that masturbation is in any way

> an act of self love, as most all of us have a somewhat vivid
imagination, 
> and the fact that we're doing the deed has little to do with what is
going 
> on in our imagination at the time.
>
    You are not following what I wrote. I said, that mentally disabled 
people may be ***ually able, as evidenced by their ability to masturbate, 
but they often do not associate this act with the opposite *** in any way.

This makes them in effect unable to reproduce.
    I remember us boys in class comparing girls we thought of when 
masturbating. There was this one, weird boy who thought of his mom's fur 
coat, instead of a girl. I am quite sure such a one will be unable / 
unwilling to perform coitus. 



-- 
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
 




 5 Posts in Topic:
Re: Homo***uality: An 'Interview' with Jesus
"Pastor Frank"   2007-12-24 01:08:10 
Re: Homo***uality: An 'Interview' with Jesus
"Willy" <wil  2007-12-26 13:30:10 
Re: Homo***uality. The cause and cure.
"Pastor Frank"   2007-12-27 04:54:00 
Re: Homo***uality. The cause and cure.
"Willy" <wil  2007-12-28 15:51:43 
Re: Homo***uality. The cause and cure.
"Pastor Frank"   2007-12-28 16:20:55 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Fri Jul 25 16:41:25 CDT 2008.