"Pastor Frank" <PF@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:476f9b40$0$26116$88260bb3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "**Rowland Croucher**" <rccroucher@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in
message
> news:476e3c99$0$7238$afc38c87@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> For the record, I am an active/exclusive hetero***ual. I believe that
(a)
>> God intended marriage between a male and a female to be the norm for
>> humans, but (b) the vast majority of homo***uals - if not all of them -
>> did not choose their orientation, and (c) they have a right to be
treated
>> as precious human beings created in the image of God like the rest of
us.
>>
> That's is living with obesity because hunger is natural. If we
thought
> like that of ANY aberrant behaviour, then no cure would ever be found
for
> anything. The question should be: Why does homo***uality occur, and is
> there a prevention possible and/or desirable? Perhaps we should
encourage
> homo***uality to prevent overpopulation? Then what produces the maximum
> results?
> Considering, that homo***uality is rare among the poor and primitive,
> it is obviously a cultural phenomena. When we ask ourselves what
cultural
> phenomena that might be, then it must be one, that is uncommon among the
> poor and primitive, such children sleeping alone. Look at the normal
> sleeping arrangement among mammals, and you see the young sleeping
> touching each other, if not their parents also, and so do the children
of
> the poor and primitive. The very young sleeping in separate beds, if not
> also in separate rooms is quite unnatural and apparently prevents them
> from assuming gender appropriate roles at an optimal age, which is
> probably before the child can talk.
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
...
Wow P Frank: I've NEVER heard of this theory, and I thought I'd heard
them
all.
Is this your speculation alone, or have you seen research to sup****t this
concept?
If so, I'd be very interested in the source as I'd like to research the
thought process further.
Willy
>
|
