Credited to: http://www.geocities.com/Metzad/
Credited to: http://www.geocities.com/Metzad/prophecies.htm
Submitted: Anonymously. (USA)
7-jewish.htm
Why don't the Jewish people recognize the New Testament?
by Eliyahu Silver & Rabbi Yitschak Goldstein
........All Biblical quotations are taken from the King James translation,
the Authorized Version, unless specified otherwise.
........The Jewish reader is advised not to pronounce the names Jesus and
Eastre; "The names of other gods you shall not mention, nor shall your
mouth
cause it to be heard." Exodus 23:13
Introduction.
........For almost 2000 years the Jewish people have not recognized the
New
Testament, although all those who contributed to the New Testament were
Jewish. All the writers of the New Testament were Jewish, but nevertheless
the Jewish people reject that which 1,000,000,000 people consider to be
the
word of G.d.
........What is it that the Jews see in the New Testament that is
apparently
not seen by all the Christians?
The Jews look at the New Testament from an Old Testament viewpoint. About
3300 years ago G.d gave the Torah to the Jewish people. Millions of people
watched this event when G.d spoke from Mount Sinai to the Jewish people.
There G.d gave to the Jewish people the Holy Torah, which is the first
five
books of the Bible; Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy.
This does not only contain the Ten Commandments, but it contains a total
of
613 commandments that G.d commanded the Jewish people to fulfill.
The Torah is the most holy part of the Hebrew Bible.
........Later prophets arose, whose works are added to form the Hebrew
Bible.
The Torah teaches that there is one G.d, Y-H-W-H, who is a jealous G.d,
who
allows no other gods beside Him. See Exodus 20:3. G.d's name, Y-H-W-H,
appears almost 7000 times in the Old Testament. The King James translation
translates this name as "The LORD", with small capital letters. This G.d
is
the one and only G.d for the Jews, as it is written in the Hebrew Bible;
"Know therefore this day, and consider it in your heart, that the LORD, he
is G.d in heaven above, and upon the earth beneath; there is no other."
Deuteronomy 4:39
"See now that I, even I, am He, and there is no god with me."
Deuteronomy..32:39
"I am He, before Me no god was created, neither shall there be after Me."
Isaiah 43:10
"Thus saith the LORD, the King of Israel and his redeemer, the LORD of
hosts, I am the first, and I am the last, and beside Me there is no god."
Isaiah 44:6
"I am the LORD, and there is none else." Isaiah 45:18
This Jewish G.d is one, as it is written; "Hear Israel, Y-H-W-H is our
G.d,
..Y-H-W-H is one." Deuteronomy 6:4 The King James translation translates
this
as: "Hear Israel, the LORD our G.d is one LORD." . Here in Deuteronomium
6:4
too, the word "the LORD" stands for Y-H-W-H in the Hebrew text. When we
insert G.d's name into this translation, we get; "Hear Israel, Y-H-W-H our
G.d is one Y-H-W-H." This is not a correct translation, the correct
translation is as above mentioned; "Hear Israel, Y-H-W-H is our G.d,
Y-H-W-H
is one."
.....The fact that G.d is one is so im****tant that G.d commands this to be
in
the heart. It must be diligently taught to the children, the Jews must
talk
about it when they sit in their houses, when they walk upon the way, when
they lie down and when they rise up. They must bind it as a sign upon
their
arm, and it must be frontlets between their eyes, and they must write it
upon the doorposts of their houses and upon their gates. See Deuteronomy
6:4-9 --
----The Jews until this day do this. Every morning they put upon their arm
and upon their forehead their phylacteries, (prayer belts) that consist of
black straps with black leather cubes, that contain parchment upon which
is
written this Biblical text that says that G.d is one. Upon the doorposts
of
the houses of the religious Jews there are small boxes or containers that
also contain parchment upon which is written that G.d is one.
So for the Jewish people there is one G.d, and that one G.d is one.
One means one. That is not two, not three, not three in one, not two in
one,
but.ONE.
wwwAnd then a Jew stands up and claims that he is the messiah, the
redeemer
that is announced by the prophets. But he did not do what he was supposed
to
do, set the Jews free from their oppressors, the Romans, and establish an
era of peace and tranquility for the Jewish people and all mankind.
Instead
he was killed, and all that is left of him is a collection of writings,
called the New Testament. For the Jewish people, the Old Testament is the
established word of G.d. Therefore, everything written in the New
Testament
must comply with the Old Testament, and not the other way around. The Old
Testament can without any problem stand on his own, without the New
Testament. The Jewish people have shown this already for more than 3000
years, but the New Testament can not stand on its own without the Old
Testament, because it claims to be the fulfillment of the Old Testament.
Look for this fact in the following verses:
wwwwMatthew 5:17; "Think not that I have come to destroy the law or the
prophets, I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill."
------Luke 4:16-21; "And there was delivered to him the book of the
prophet
Esaias . and he began to say unto them: This day is this scripture
fulfilled
in your ears."
So if the New Testament goes against the Old Testament, it must be
rejected
as being false.
Now let us take a closer and open-minded look at the New Testament.
1. The reliability of the New Testament
........Let's start at the beginning, that is the book of Matthew. It
starts
with a genealogy of Jesus, starting with Abraham and ending with Joseph,
Mary's husband, "of who is born Jesus, who is called Christ." Matthew
1:16.
It is further stated, in verse 17, that all the generations from Abraham
to
David were 14 generations, and from David to the Babylonian exile were 14
generations, and from the exile to Christ were 14 generations. Here
already
we stumble upon a major problem; in the Holy book of Chronicles, I Chr.
3:10-24, the genealogy of the family of Solomon is given, and in the book
of
Chronicles there are 18 generations between King David and the Babylonian
exile, and not 14.
Hebrew Bible ........
New Testament
I Chr. 3:10-16
Matthew 1:6-11
Solomon
Solomon
Rehoboam
Roboam
Abia
Abia
Asa
Asa
Jehoshaphat
Josaphat
Joram
Joram
Ahazia
----
Joash
---- ?
Amazia
----
Azaria
Ozias
Jotham
Joatham
Ahaz
Achaz
Hezekia
Ezekias
Manasseh
Man*****
Amon
Amon
Josia
Josias
Jehoiakim
---- ?
Jeconia
Jechonias
........In the genealogy in the Book of Matthew we are missing four names
that are clearly listed in the Hebrew Bible. So according to the Holy Old
Testament there are 18 generations between King David and the Babylonian
exile, whereas the New Testament claims that there are 14.
If the New Testament is the divinely inspired word of G.d, then how can
such
a mistake appear in it?
In this context it is also interesting to look at the book of Luke,
chapter
3, from verse 23. Here Luke also gives the genealogy of Jesus, but a brief
reading is enough to show you that this genealogy is completely different
from Matthew's genealogy. In the book of Matthew the father of Joseph is
Jacob, whose father is Matthan, whose father is Eleazar. In the book of
Luke
the father of Joseph is Heli, whose father is Matthat, whose father is
Levi.
How can this be?...... Was Mary married to two Josephs?
........Things like this constitute a grave problem for somebody who looks
objectively and open-mindedly to the New Testament.
........Some say that Luke gives the genealogy of Jesus through his mother
Mary. But this makes no sense, because it is clearly written in Luke 3:23;
"And Jesus himself began to be about 30 years of age, being (as was
supposed) the son of Joseph, who was the son of Heli, who was the son of
...." It clearly gives the genealogy of Joseph. The name Mary is not even
mentioned in this chapter.
........So the New Testament not only contradicts the Old Testament, but
it
also contradicts itself. Since we have two different genealogies, at least
one must be wrong. These difficulties were already recognized in the time
of
Paul. Therefore he wrote to Titus: "But avoid foolish questions and
genealogies and strivings about the law, for they are unprofitable and
vain." Titus 3:9. See also I Timothy 1:3-4.
But avoiding the problem does not make it go away.
The facts are that here already are big mistakes in the gospels.
wwwwIn Matthew 1:18 we read: "Now the birth of Jesus Christ was on this
wise; When his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came
together, she was found to be with child of the Holy ghost." When Joseph
wanted to leave her, because she was pregnant with somebody else, an angel
came to him (verse 20) and said: "That what is conceived in her is of the
Holy Ghost." It is clearly written here, and firmly believed by
Christianity, that Joseph was not the father of Jesus. Then what is the
point of trying to prove that Jesus descended from King David (Matthew
1:1)
by giving the genealogy of Joseph who was not his father?
The angel tells Joseph (Matthew 1:22-23) that this is done in order to
fulfill the word of the prophet: "Behold, a virgin shall be with child,
and
shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel." This
prophecy is recorded in Isaiah 7:14. There it says: "Behold a virgin shall
conceive and bare a son and shall call his name Emmanuel." But for the
Jewish reader who knows Hebrew, this also raises problems. The Hebrew word
in Isaiah 7:14 that the king James translation translates as virgin is
almah. In Hebrew almah means girl, young woman, that can be, or not, a
virgin. Therefore the word virgin in Isaiah 7:14 is a wrong translation.
The
Hebrew word for virgin is betulah, that word is used for instance when the
Holy Torah speaks about Rebecca in Genesis 24:16: ".a virgin, neither had
any man known her"
......This fact is recognized by many Christian Bible translators, for
instance "The New English Bible", "The Good News Bible", and "The Revised
Standard Version" have translated this verse in the right way, and not as
virgin. .
-----The King James translation recognizes this fact too. When we look for
instance at Exodus 2:8, and at Proverbs 30:19, there the Hebrew text also
uses the word almah, and there the King James translates it with maid,
which
is a girl or young woman, whose state of virginity is unspecified. And in
psalm 68:25 the King James translates almah as damsel, whose meaning is
similar as maid.
So the New Testament is here misquoting the Old Testament.
........Nowhere in the Old Testament is there a prophecy that the messiah
will be born unto a virgin.... In fact, nowhere in the Old Testament do
virgins give birth. This concept is only to be found in pagan mythology.
........The angel goes on quoting the prophet Isaiah saying: "And they
shall
call his name Immanuel". But this is not what is written in Isaiah 7:14;
there it clearly says in the Hebrew and in the King James translation,
that
she, the mother, shall call his name Immanuel. This prophecy is never
fulfilled in Jesus, he is never named Immanuel, instead his name was
Jesus.
This verse also cannot apply to Jesus because it says in verse 16: "For
before the child shall know to refuse evil and choose the good, the land
that thou abhorrest shall be forsaken of their kings." It says here that
there will be a time period that the child will not be able to refuse the
evil. And since Jesus is, according to Christianity, without any sins,
this
verse cannot apply to him. ... And when we look at this verse in the right
context, when we look at the whole chapter of Isaiah 7, then we see that
this verse is definitely not refering to the coming of the messiah. This
chapter talks about G.d giving a sign to Achaz, that he will have
tranquility in his days. We see from this two things: the whole chapter
speaks about the days of Achaz, about 700 years before Jesus; verse 14:
"Therefore the LORD himself shall give you (King Achaz and his house) a
sign." G.d would not give him a sign by having a baby born 700 years after
his death. The second thing that we see is that the baby that is talked
about is only a sign, not a redeemer. G.d is the redeemer, as it is
written
in verse 17: "The LORD shall bring upon thee."
........But quoting prophecies or conveying happenings from the Old
Testament
is not really the strong side of the New Testament. Look for instance at
the
book of Acts chapter 7. Here Stephen is arrested and led before the high
court, accused of blasphemy. He speaks there about G.d calling Abraham.
Acts
7:4 says: "He dwelt in Charran, and from there, when his father was dead,
He
removed him into this land wherein you now dwell." Here it clearly says
that
Abraham left Charran after the death of his father. Who was his father?
See
Genesis 11:26: "And Terah lived 70 years and he begot Abram, Nahor and
Haran."....--So Abraham's father was Terah, who was 70 years when he begot
Abraham.-Genesis 12:4: "And Abraham was 75 years old when he departed from
Haran." At this time, when Abraham departed from Haran, his father was
70+75=145 years old. And how long did his father live? Genesis 11:32: "And
the days of Terah were 205 years and Terah died in Haran."..
........ When Abraham left Haran his father was 145 years old. His father
lived to be 205 years old. That means that after Abraham left Haran, his
father lived another 60 years. (205-145)
So how can Stephen say that Abraham left Haran after the death of his
father?
........In the same chapter it is written, Acts 7:14; "Then send Joseph
and
called his father Jacob to him, and all his kindred, threescore and
fifteen
souls." Now look what the Holy book of Genesis says about this event.
Genesis 46:27; "All the souls of the house of Jacob that came into Egypt
were threescore and ten souls." So the Torah says that 70 people of Jacobs
household left for Egypt, and Stephen says 75. How can this be?
........In verses 15 and 16 of Acts 7 Stephen says; "So Jacob went down
into
Egypt and died, he and our fathers, and were carried over into Sychem, and
laid into the sepulchre that Abraham bought for a sum of money of the sons
of Emmor, the father of Sychem."
-----...This verse contains multiple mistakes.
Jacob was not buried in Schem, he was buried in the cave of the field of
Machpela at Mamre. Genesis 49:33; "And when Jacob had made an end to
commanding his sons he gathered up his feet into the bed and yielded up
the
ghost and was gathered unto his people."
Genesis 50:13; "For his sons carried him into the land of Canaan and
buried
him in the cave of the field of Machpela which Abraham bought with the
field
for a possession for a burying place of Ephron the Hittite before Mamre."
So we see that Abraham did not buy a tomb in Schem, but in Mamre, which is
Hebron, (Genesis 23:19) and there was Jacob buried, and not in Schem.
......There was in fact a burial place in Schem, but it was bought not by
Abraham, but by Jacob, and not Jacob, but Joseph was buried there. See
Joshua 24:32: "And the bones of Joseph which the children of Israel
brought
up out of Egypt buried they in Shechem, in a parcel of ground that Jacob
bought of the sons of Hamor, the father of Shechem, for a hundred pieces
of
silver."
........About Stephen it is written (Acts 6:5), that he was full of the
Holy
Ghost, and that they were not able to resist the spirit and wisdom by
which
he spoke. (verse 10)
What kind of wisdom is this, making mistake after mistake after mistake,
all
these misquotations?
Can somebody who is full of the Holy Ghost make so many mistakes?
What does this say about the reliability of the New Testament?
.........And what about the leading figure of the New Testament, Jesus,
how
reliable are his statements? Look at a statement by him from Mark 2:26.
Here
he says that David entered the Temple (Tabernacle) in the days of Abiathar
the high priest and ate the showbreads. This event is recorded in I Samuel
21:1; "Then came David to Nob, to Achimelech the priest, ." During this
incident Achimelech was high priest, and not his son Abiathar. A high
priest
functions until the day he dies, and then his son takes over. So only
after
the death of Achimelech, recorded in I Samuel 22:18, did his son Abiathar
succeed him, as we can see in I Samuel 30:7; "And David said to Abiathar
the
priest, Achimelech's son, ."
Let us take a look at an other of Jesus' statements, from Matthew 23:35:
"That upon you may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from
the blood of the righteous Able unto the blood of Zacherias son of
Berachias, whom you slaughtered between the Temple and the altar." This
event is recorded in II Chronicles 24:20-21; "And the spirit of G.d came
upon Zacheriah son of Jehoiada the priest which stood above the people,
and
said to them . And they conspired against him, and stoned him with stones,
at the commandment of the King, in the house of the LORD". .
........ Here we see that the Zacherias who was slaughtered between the
Temple and the altar was the son of Jehoiada, and not the son of Berachia,
as stated by Jesus. Jesus was mixing up two things: There was a prophet
Zacherias son of Berachias, but he was not the one who was slain (II
Chronicles 24:22) in the Temple courtyard. Zacherias son of Berachias was
the prophet who gave us the Bible book Zacheriah. Look in Zacheriah 1:1;
"In
the eight month in the second year of Darius came the word of the LORD
(Y-H-W-H) to Zecheriah, son of Berechiah, son of Iddo the prophet." This
Zecheriah lived after the destruction of the first Temple, during the
rebuilding of the second Temple. The killing of Zacherias son of Jehoiada
in
the Temple courtyard happened in the first Temple period, long before
Zecheriah son of Berechiah. In case that in your Bible translation
Zacheriah
1:1 says "Zecheriah, son of Iddo the prophet, ." then be assured of the
fact
that the Hebrew text says; "Zecheriah, son of Berachiah, son of Iddo the
prophet, ." In some Bible translations is the text corrupted in order to
cover up this mistake of Jesus.
........So from this we see that even the words of Jesus are not reliable.
........How can it be that the "son of G.d", according to Christianity G.d
himself, makes such elementary mistakes?
........To a Jewish reader this indicates that the people from the New
Testament just did not know their Bible.
........For a Jew this is enough to disqualify the whole New Testament.
........The arguments; "O.K, the New Testament is not reliable, but the
Old
Testament, which is much older, is also not reliable", or the argument;
"The
Jews changed the Old Testament after the rise of Christianity, in order to
discredit Christianity" are not valid. The Torah, the most Holy part of
the
Hebrew Bible, is transmitted through the ages, over a time period of 3300
years with an astoni****ng degree of accuracy. There are very many rules
that
apply to the copying process of Torah scrolls: They may only be written on
parchment of kosher animals, which must be sewn together with tendons of
kosher animals. It may only be written by a Jew, dressed in a Jewish
garment, in a state of ritual purity, which means that, amongst other
things, he must wash himself in a ritual bath. Even his state of mind is
subjected to certain rulings. The whole manuscript must be ruled before it
is written upon, when three words are written without ruling, the whole
manuscript is disqualified and must be buried. The ink may only be black,
prepared according to an ancient recipe. The Torah scroll may only be
copied
from another authentic scroll, and absolutely no deviation is allowed.
Absolutely no words may be written without first looking to the example.
The
length of each column must be between 48 and 60 rules, and the width must
be
30 letters. Between the letters must be a space as wide as a hair, between
the paragraphs a space of nine letters, between the books a space of three
rules. Calculations have been made how many letters there are in the whole
Torah, which letter is the middle, how many letters there are in every
book
of the Torah, how many times certain words and even letters appear in the
text. And there are many, many more rules for copying Torah scrolls that
are
still in effect, up to this day. No other religion had such an extremely
precise way of copying their holy texts. This shows the enormous respect
that the Jewish people have for the sacred text, and this is the reason
that
the text is handed down through the millennia with an extreme grade of
accuracy. .......Every expert, and everybody knowledgeable in the field of
Biblical texts, agrees upon the fact that the Old Testament, even though
much older than the New Testament, is handed down much more accurate than
the New Testament.
........The Old Testament could not be changed after the arising of
Christianity, because it was already widely known to the non-Jewish world.
Alexander the Great founded in 332 before the Common Era (B.C.E.) the city
Alexandria. The Jews had there from the beginning a prominent place, and
at
one point there were living there one million Jews. The main language
there
was Greek, therefore a Greek translation of the Old Testament was made for
the Jews there, known as the Septuagint. Septuagint means seventy. It
points
to the 72 translators, six of every tribe of Israel, who made this
translation, which was finished about 250 B.C.E. One copy of the
Septuagint
was kept in the library of Alexandria.
........When the Jewish people were exiled to Babylon, the land was filled
with pagan tribes. They mixed with the remnant of the Jews, and started to
take over large parts of the Jewish religion, and they accepted the Torah.
A
Jewish priest was sent from Babylon in order to teach those pagan tribes,
now living in Samaria, how to live according G.d's commandments. (II Kings
17:24-29) When the Jews came back from the Babylonian exile, these
Samaritans wanted to join the Jewish people, but they were rejected
because
they were still involved in idol wor****p. This caused a great deal of
animosity between the Jews and the Samaritans. The Samaritans even
obstructed the rebuilding of the second Temple. (Ezra 4) The Samaritans
remained a sect separated from the Jewish people and their entire Bible
consists of the first five books, the Torah. These events took place about
350 B.C.E. The Samaritans are still around today as a small sect in
Israel.
The Samaritan Torah and the Septuagint were not subjected to such a very
precise copying process as the Jewish Torah. But nevertheless, when we
compare the Old Testament to the Septuagint, and the Jewish Torah to the
Samaritan Torah, then we see that in most places were Stephen and Jesus
made
serious mistakes, these texts agree with the Jewish Bible. Therefore, even
the Greek Orthodox Church and the Catholic Church of Greek rite, who up to
this day have the Septuagint as their official text of the Old Testament,
are faced with serious problems.
........Even the name "New Testament" is not correct: It points to the new
covenant that G.d will make with the Jewish people. Paul claims that this
is
done through Jesus. Paul says in Hebrews 10:15-17; "Whereof the Holy Ghost
is also a witness to us, for after he had said before: This is the
covenant
that I will make with them, after those days, saith the LORD, I will put
My
laws in their heart and in their minds will I write them. And their sins
and
iniquities will I remember no more." This is written in Jeremiah 31:31-34;
"Behold, the days come saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant
with
the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah. Not according the old
covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the
hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt, which my covenant they broke,
although I was as a husband to them, saith the LORD. But this shall be the
covenant that I make with the house of Israel: After those days, saith the
LORD, I will put my law in there inward parts and write it in their
hearts,
and I will be there G.d, and they shall be my people. And they shall no
more
each man teach his neighbor, and every man his brother, saying: Know the
LORD, for they shall all know me, from the least of them till the
greatest,
saith the LORD, for I will forgive their iniquity and I will remember
their
sins no more."
Are we now in the days that everybody knows about the LORD
(Y-H-W-H)?----.That nobody has to teach his neighbor about G.d?
..............................Obviously not!
.........So even the reference to the new covenant, the "New Testament",
is
not correct.
..
..
2. The divinity of Jesus.
..
........Let us now take a look at the message that the New Testament is
trying to give us, armed with the knowledge that, as shown before, there
is
one G.d, and that one G.d is one. Surprising as it may be, in the New
Testament G.d is also one. Look for this fact at the following verses:
Mark
12:29-34. Here Jesus himself, when asked what is the first commandment,
quotes Deuteronomy 6:4: "Hear Israel, the Lord our G.d is one Lord." And
in
verse 32 he is answered: "There is one G.d, and there is no other than
He",
upon which Jesus replies: "You are not far from the kingdom of G.d."
So also for Jesus there clearly is one G.d who is one.
........And what about Paul, who wrote more than half of all the books of
the
New Testament, what does he think about it?
Romans 3:30: "Seeing it is one G.d, ."
I Corinthians 8:4: "We know that an idol is nothing in the world and that
there is no other G.d than one."
idem verse 6: "But to us there is but one G.d ."
Ephesians 4:6; "One G.d and father of all, ."
I Timothy 2:5; "For there is one G.d ."
And look what James says in James 2:19; "You believe that there is one
G.d,
and you do well."
...............................Also in the New Testament there is one G.d
who
is one.
........Please take good notice that nowhere here is spoken about, or even
hinted at a trinity.
..............The concept of trinity is nowhere to be found in the Old or
the
New Testament.
........And what does the New Testament say about Jesus? It says that he
is a
god. Look for instance at what Thomas says to Jesus; "My Lord and my god."
John 20:28.
The gospel of John turns Jesus into the creating G.d. Look at the first
verses of John 1; "In the beginning was the word, and the word was with
G.d,
and the word was G.d. The same was in the beginning with G.d." Here, in
verses 1 and 2, it clearly says that "the word" is G.d..... Now look at
verse 3; "All things are made by him, and without him was not anything
made
that was made." Here it says that everything is made by him (the word), so
the word is the creating G.d. Who is the word? Look at verse 14; "And the
word became flesh, and dwelt among us, and we beheld his glory, the glory
as
of the only begotten of the father." The word made flesh is, according to
Christianity, Jesus. So according the New Testament Jesus is the creating
G.d. Also in Colossians 1:16 it clearly says that Jesus is the creating
G.d.
Please read verse 12-18 of Colossians 1 in order to get a clear overview
of
this.
........In John 10:30 Jesus says; "I and my father are one."
........So here we have a case of a human being saying that he is G.d. But
according to the Holy Hebrew scriptures this is impossible, because it is
stated in Numbers 23:19, in I Samuel 15:29, and in Hosea 11:9 that G.d is
not a man. The Jewish idea about G.d is that He is a spiritual being, and
not flesh and blood. See Genesis 1:2; "And the spirit of G.d moved upon
the
face of the waters."... For a Jew it is an abomination that the one true
G.d
should be a human. G.d is an indefinable, spiritual, invisible being.
"There
shall no man see me and live." Exodus 33:20. By saying that G.d is a man,
or
that He is 2, or 3, or 3 in 1, you are defining G.d, who is indefinable.
........The idea that Jesus was G.d also goes against the oneness of G.d.
How
can G.d be one when He is walking around upon the earth as a man and at
the
same time He is in heaven?
........Even though Jesus says that he and the father are one, this is
clearly not the case. Look at Matthew 23:9; "And call no man your father
upon the earth, for one is your father, which is in heaven." So here Jesus
excludes himself from being the father in heaven.
Luke 22:41-42; "He prayed, saying: . not my will, but thine be done." This
also indicates that the father and Jesus are not the same person,
otherwise
he would be praying to himself. If they were the same person then Jesus'
will would have been automatically the will of the father, but he says:
Not
my will but your will be done.
........So they were clearly two different entities.
Even in heaven Jesus is subordinated to the father according I Corinthians
15:28, Matthew 20:23, Philippians 2:9, so it is impossible that they are
the
same person. We can add many other examples to this. The interested reader
can read for example Matthew 24:36, John 5:19-23, 12:27, 17:24, 18:11,
Colossians 1:15.
When Jesus hangs on the cross he shouts out: "My G.d, my G.d, why hast
thou
forsaken me?" Matthew 27:46
...........................................Did G.d forsake himself?
........This leaves us with a G.d "the father" in heaven, and a G.d "the
son"
on earth. Since we have established that there is only one G.d, and that
that one G.d is one, there is now one G.d too many.
......... The one true G.d says: "Thou shall have no other gods before Me,
.
Thou shall not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them; For I the LORD
thy
G.d am a jealous G.d." Exodus 20:3+5. Jesus completely agrees with this.
He
says in Matthew 4:10: "Thou shalt wor****p the Lord thy G.d, and him only
shalt you serve." See also Luke 4:8
But how then can we explain the statements of Jesus when he says "That all
man should honour the son, even as they honour the Father." John 5:23.
-- "If any man serve me, let him follow me, .if any man serve me, him will
my father honour." John 12:26.
How can this be?www This is idolatry!!.
..
........These facts did not pass by unnoticed by the early Christian
church.
In the early centuries of the Christian church there was no such thing as
a
trinity. The church looked upon Jesus as a "half god", according to the
teachings of Origen, who lived from 185 to 254. But in 318, the presbyter
Arius got into a conflict with his bishop, because of his firm statements
about Jesus. Since he was a Bible scholar, he could not accept that Jesus
was a god, since the Bible teaches that there is only one G.d, and
therefore
he taught that Jesus was not a god but a creature. But his bishop,
Alexander, disputed that because the New Testament clearly turns Jesus
into
a god. This dispute got so much out of hand that it threatened to tear up
the early Christian church, therefore specially for this dispute a synod
was
organized; the synod of Nice in 325, and there the dispute is settled.
First
Jesus and "G.d the Father" become a duality, and later the Holy Ghost is
added to form a trinity. (History of the church, by Dr. H. Berkhof, 6th
ed.
1955, pages 68-70).
So the invention of the trinity was a forced way out of the problem of
having two gods, where the Bible teaches that there is only one. And this
is
what the Christian churches believe and teach up to this day, that G.d is
a
trinity.
But nowhere in the Bible can anything be found that says that there is
such
a thing as a trinity.
And what about I John 5:7? "For there are three that bear record in
heaven,
the Father, the word and the Holy Ghost, and these three are one."
----Well, this looks like a good verse to prove a trinity, except for the
fact that this is a falsification of your Bible. In the original Greek
scriptures of the New Testament this text does not exist. This text was
added later to the New Testament in a desperate attempt to prove a trinity
that cannot be proven. The New Testament has come to us in bits and
pieces,
a gospel from here, a letter of Paul from there. The first ones who
compiled
out of this a reliable text of the Greek New Testament, were Westcott and
Hort in 1881. In that Greek text I John 5:7 says: "For there are three
witness bearers."
That's all.
Followed by verse 8: "The spirit and the water and the blood, and the
three
are into the one." The whole part about the Father, the word, and the Holy
Ghost, and these being one, does not exist in the original Greek text.
The Greek text of the New Testament of Dr. Eberhard Nestle is nowadays
considered to be the most reliable Greek text available, and in that text
the verses 7 and 8 of I John 5 are exactly the same as in the Greek text
of
Westcott and Hort. (You don't have to take my word for this, just ask your
pastor or reverend, and he will confirm these facts, unless of course, he
is
outright lying to you.)
There is no such thing as a trinity, not in the Old Testament and not in
the
New Testament.
The proofs for the oneness of G.d are however abundant. Look at these
texts;
"The LORD, (Y-H-W-H) He is G.d, and there is none else beside Him."
Deuteronomy 4:35.
"See now that I, even I am He, and there is no G.d with me. I kill and
make
alive, I wound and I heal, neither is there any that can deliver out of my
hand." Deuteronomy 32:39.
"O LORD, there is none like thee, neither is there any G.d beside thee." I
Chronicles 17:20.
"Thou, even Thou, art LORD alone." Nehemia 9:6.
"Thou are G.d alone." Psalm 86:10.
"I am the LORD and there is none else, there is no G.d beside me: That
they
may know from the rising of the sun and from the west that there is no G.d
beside Me. I am the LORD, and there is none else." Isaiah 45:5-6.
This list can be extended with many other verses, but the meaning is
already
clear: There is only one G.d and there is none else. No son, no holy
ghost,
nothing.
G.d has no father, no son, and no brother.
There is just one G.d.
..
..
..
3. Jesus as the messiah.
..
........Who and what is the messiah? Let us check according to the Holy
Hebrew scriptures what the messiah is supposed to do. .......
Micha 5:2-9; "But thou Bethlehem Ephratah, though thou be little among the
thousands of Judah, yet out of thee shall he come forth unto me that is to
be ruler in Israel; whose goings forth have been from of old, from
everlasting. Therefore will he give them up, until the time that she which
travaileth hath brought forth: then the remnant of his brethren shall
return
unto the children of Israel. And he shall stand and feed in the strength
of
the LORD, in the majesty of the name of the LORD his God; and they shall
abide: for NOW shall he be great unto the ends of the earth. And this man
shall be the peace, when the Assyrian shall come into our land: and when
he
shall tread in our palaces, then shall we raise against him seven
shepherds,
and eight principal men. And they shall waste the land of Assyria with the
sword, and the land of Nimrod in the entrances thereof: thus shall he
deliver us from the Assyrian, when he cometh into our land, and when he
treadeth within our borders. And the remnant of Jacob shall be in the
midst
of many people as a dew from the LORD, as the showers upon the grass, that
tarrieth not for man, nor waiteth for the sons of men. And the remnant of
Jacob shall be among the Gentiles in the midst of many people as a lion
among the beasts of the forest, as a young lion among the flocks of sheep:
who, if he go through, both treadeth down, and teareth in pieces, and none
can deliver. Thine hand shall be lifted up upon thine adversaries, and all
thine enemies shall be cut off."
Here we have very clearly physical redemption from earthly enemies: "And
they shall waste the land of Assyria with the sword", "Thine hand shall be
lifted up upon thine adversaries, and all thine enemies shall be cut off."
These are very clear verses that can not be misinterpreted; when the
messiah
comes the Jewish enemies are going to be slaughtered. And the one coming
forth from Bethlehem is to be a ruler in Israel, that is a king, or maybe
nowadays a president, but not a wandering preacher and miracle healer.
..........Zacheriah 9:9-10; "Rejoice greatly, O daughter of Zion; shout, O
daughter of Jerusalem: behold, thy King cometh unto thee: he is just, and
having salvation; lowly, and riding upon an ass, and upon a colt the foal
of
an ass. And I will cut off the chariot from Ephraim, and the horse from
Jerusalem, and the battle bow shall be cut off: and he shall speak peace
unto the heathen: and his dominion shall be from sea even to sea, and from
the river even to the ends of the earth."
They say that he did ride on a donkey, like the whole Middle East in those
days, but that is where it stops. He did not bring any peace, the battle
bow, the horses and the chariots, symbols of war, were not cut off from
Jerusalem, and his dominion was not from sea to sea and to the ends of the
earth; as a matter of fact, he did not have any dominion at all.
In order to get around this problem, the Christian church invented the
"second coming". However, nowhere in the Hebrew scriptures is it written
that the messiah would come once, get himself killed, and come again in a
second coming. This is a pure rationalization of Jesus' failure to
function
in any way as a messiah. Nowhere in any of the above prophecies does it
indicate that there will be a gap of at least 2000 years between the birth
of the messiah and the redemption. Nowhere does it speak about a messiah
being tortured to death and coming back thousands of years later.
..........Jeremiah 23:5-6; "Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I
will raise unto David a righteous Branch, and a King shall reign and
prosper, and shall execute judgment and justice in the earth. In his days
Judah shall be saved, and Israel shall dwell safely: and this is his name
whereby he shall be called, THE LORD OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS."
...........Jeremiah 33:14-16: "IN THOSE DAYS AND AT THAT TIME, will I
cause
the Branch of righteousness to grow up unto David; and he shall execute
judgment and righteousness in the land. IN THOSE DAYS shall Judah be
saved,
and Jerusalem shall dwell safely: and this is the name wherewith she shall
be called, The LORD our righteousness."
When the branch of righteousness springs forth to David, when the messiah
comes, THEN, IN THOSE DAYS, Judah will be saved and Jerusalem shall dwell
safely. That means that it is impossible to squeeze in two thousand or
more
years between the coming of the messiah and the redemption of Judah and
Jerusalem. Out goes the 'second coming'. However, there wasn't any
redemption in the days of Jesus. Forty years after his death, in 70 CE,
Jerusalem was totally destroyed by the Romans, the second Temple was
burned
down, and the Jews exiled. No way that the above prophecy was fulfilled.
..
........... Isaiah 11; "And there shall come forth a rod out of the stem
of
Jesse, and a Branch shall grow out of his roots: And the spirit of the
LORD
shall rest upon him, the spirit of wisdom and understanding, the spirit of
counsel and might, the spirit of knowledge and of the fear of the LORD;
And
shall make him of quick understanding in the fear of the LORD: and he
shall
not judge after the sight of his eyes, neither reprove after the hearing
of
his ears: But with righteousness shall he judge the poor, and reprove with
equity for the meek of the earth: and he shall smite the earth with the
rod
of his mouth, and with the breath of his lips shall he slay the wicked.
And
righteousness shall be the girdle of his loins, and faithfulness the
girdle
of his reins. The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard
shall
lie down with the kid; and the calf and the young lion and the fatling
together; and a little child shall lead them. And the cow and the bear
shall
feed; their young ones shall lie down together: and the lion shall eat
straw
like the ox. And the sucking child shall play on the hole of the asp, and
the weaned child shall put his hand on the cockatrice' den. They shall not
hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountain: for the earth shall be full of
the
knowledge of the LORD, as the waters cover the sea. And in that day there
shall be a root of Jesse, which shall stand for an ensign of the people;
to
it shall the Gentiles seek: and his rest shall be glorious."
Also here we have a messiah who is going to kill the evil people: "And he
shall smite the earth with the rod of his mouth, and with the breath of
his
lips shall he slay the wicked." And after that we get the better world,
when
it says: "The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall
lie
down with the kid; and the calf and the young lion and the fatling
together;
and a little child shall lead them etc." This is what is supposed to
happen,
as soon as there shall come forth a rod out of the stem of Jesse (the
father
of King David) and a Branch shall grow out of his roots; that is as soon
as
the messiah comes. Nowhere here is mentioned that the messiah will be
killed
and that these prophecies will happen at least 2000 years later. On the
contrary; when the messiah comes redemption comes. And also for this
messianic prophecy you don't have to be a brain surgeon or a rocket
scientist in order to see that it is not fulfilled. Nothing of this all
was
done by Jesus. Conclusion: He was not the messiah.
Even in his own days people were not sure whether he was the messiah or
not.
But, he said that he would give a sign. Just one. Matthew 12:38-40; "There
shall no sign be given than the sign of the prophet Jonas: For as Jonas
was
three days and three nights in the whale's belly, so shall the son of man
be
three days and three nights in the heart of the earth." Here he clearly
says
that the only sign he will give is his being in the grave for three days
and
three nights.
He was crucified on Friday afternoon, the day before the Sabbath. Mark
15:42
He was supposedly resurrected on Sunday morning. Mark 16:9.
Can you fit in between Friday afternoon and Sunday morning three days and
three nights?
From this we must conclude that he did not live up (die up?) to the only
sign he promised.
........As for saving us in this world he did not do a very good job. And
what about saving us for the next world? According to the New Testament
Jesus is the savior of mankind, without him no salvation is possible. What
does G.d say about this in the Hebrew Bible? Isaiah 43:3: "For I am the
LORD
(Y-H-W-H) thy G.d, the Holy one of Israel, thy saviour."
So here it clearly says that the one and only G.d is our savior.
Does G.d need another savior? Is there another savior? Isaiah 43:10-11:
"Before Me there was no G.d formed, neither shall there be after me, even
I,
I am the LORD, and beside Me there is no saviour."
Isaiah 45:21-22: "... I the LORD, and there is no G.d else beside Me, a
just
G.d and a saviour, there is no saviour beside Me. Look unto Me and be you
saved, all the ends of the earth: for I am G.d and there is none else."
Hosea 13:4: "Yet I am the LORD thy G.d, and thou shall know no G.d but Me,
for there is no saviour beside Me."
So here we see that the LORD (Y-H-W-H) is our savior and that there is
none
but him. G.d is not a man that He should lie (Numbers 23:19); so we must
put
our trust in G.d and not in a man. "Thus saith the LORD: Cursed be the man
that trusteth in man. Blessed is the man that trusteth in the LORD, and
whose hope the LORD is." Jeremiah 17:5+7.
..
..
..
4. Jesus as a prophet.
..
.........Let us take a look at the prophetic qualities of Jesus.
In Matthew 4:17 he claims that the kingdom of heaven is at hand..
Now, almost 2000 years later, the kingdom is still not here.
This claim of Jesus to return soon in order to judge the whole world is
all
over the New Testament. Look for instance in Revelations 1:1-3, idem 3:11,
idem 22:6, 10-12, 20. Everywhere here is spoken about a soon return and
the
early Christian communities were expecting the return of Christ in their
lifetimes, as we can read in I Corinthians 7:29, Romans 13:11-12, and I
Peter 4:7. Their belief in a return of Christ in their lifetimes was based
upon very clear, not to be misunderstood statements of Jesus. Look for an
impressive prophesy in Mark 13:24-30: "The sun shall be darkened and the
moon shall not give her light. And the stars of heaven will fall and the
powers that are in heaven shall be shaken. And then they shall see the son
of man coming in the clouds with great power and glory. And then he shall
send his angels and shall gather together his elect from the four winds,
from the uttermost part of the earth to the uttermost part of heaven ...
Verily I say to you, that this generation shall not pass till all these
things be done." -----See also Matthew 24:29-35 and Luke 21;25-33. .
-.....This generation passed away almost 2000 years ago, and no one has
seen
him coming back on the clouds to establish his kingdom of peace and gather
in his elected Christians.
........In Matthew 16:27-28 Jesus says: "For the son of man shall come in
the
glory of his father with his angels; and then he shall reward every man
according to his works. Verily I say unto you, there be some standing here
which shall not taste of death till they see the son of man coming in his
kingdom." See also Mark 9:1
........Did anybody see him coming in his kingdom? Is every man already
rewarded according to his works?... But some of them would not die until
they would have seen him coming in his kingdom!...Are they still around
today?....Even Methuselah didn't live that long!
..,......From this we must conclude that Jesus has a very poor resume as a
prophet. What does the Holy Torah that the only eternal G.d gave to the
Jewish people say about this?
Deuteronomy 18:20-22: "But the prophet which shall presume to speak a word
in my name which I have not commanded him to speak, or that shall speak in
the name of other gods, even that prophet shall die. And if you say in
your
heart; how shall we know the word that the LORD has not spoken? When a
prophet speaks in the name of the LORD, if the thing follows not, nor come
to pass, this is the thing that the LORD has not spoken, but the prophet
has
spoken it presumptuously, you shall not be afraid of him."
........Here G.d commands the Jewish people to execute false prophets, who
are prophets whose prophecies do not come true. Jesus is a perfect example
of a prophet whose prophecy did not come true. See also the prophecy
concerning the three days and three nights that did not come true.
........And what about the miracles that he is supposed to have done?
Jesus placed himself in the place of G.d (John 10:30, 14:9), and he
demanded
to be wor****pped like Him (John 5:23), and people did wor****p him (Matthew
2:11, 8:2, 14:33, John 9:38*).
So if he really performed these miracles, then applies to him the law of
G.d
that says: "If there arise among you a prophet or a dreamer of dreams, and
giveth thee a sign or wonder, and the sign or wonder comes to pass whereof
he spake onto thee, saying: Let us go after other gods which thou has not
known, and let us serve them; Thou shall not hearken to the words of that
prophet or dreamer of dreams, for the LORD (Y-H-W-H) your G.d proveth you,
whether you love the LORD thy G.d with all your heart and all your soul.
You
shall walk after the LORD your G.d and fear Him, and keep His commandments
and obey His voice, and you shall serve Him and cleave to Him. And that
prophet or dreamer of dreams shall be put to death; because he hath spoken
to turn you away from the LORD your G.d which brought you out of the land
of
Egypt, and redeemed you out of the house of bondage, to thrust thee out of
the way which the LORD thy G.d commanded thee to walk in. So shall thou
put
the evil away from the midst of thee." Deuteronomy 13:1-5.
* If you are a Y-E-H-O-V-A-H witness, and you read these verses in the
translation that is made by your church, than it will not say that Jesus
was
wor****pped. It says in your "New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures"
that they did obeisance to him, where all other translations say that he
was
wor****pped. Since you don't believe in a trinity, but only believe in the
one true G.d (may his name be blessed), your translation had to be made in
such a way that it would fit your religion. However, in Matthew 4:9-10,
and
in Luke 4:7-8, the devil tries to entice Jesus to wor****p him. Jesus
answers
upon this that G.d must be wor****pped and Him alone must be rendered
sacred
service. The Greek word proskuneo, here correctly translated in your
translation as "wor****p", is also used in these verses where it says that
Jesus is wor****pped. You can very easily verify this by means of "The
Kingdom Interlinear Translation of the Greek Scriptures", published by
your
own church. This is a Greek text of the New Testament, based upon the
Greek
text of Westcott and Hort, that has an English translation alongside and
underneath each Greek word. Please ask your spiritual leaders why in one
place the word proskuneo is translated as "to wor****p", and in another
place
as "to do obeisance." Since you already believe in the one true G.d, you
are
just one small step away from being a righteous Noachide. Open your eyes
and
realize the truth about him that you think is your Messiah and take upon
you
all the Noachide commandments.
..
..
..
5. Jesus' attitude towards non-Jews.
..
..
........How did Jesus behave towards people who were not Jewish? When a
Canaanite woman approached him because her daughter was possessed, he said
to her: "I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel."
Matthew 15:21-24. Here he refuses to help her because she is not Jewish.
After she insists he says: "It is not meet to take the children's bread
and
cast it to dogs." Here Jesus is calling the Canaanite woman a dog because
she is not Jewish. After the woman humiliates herself and also compares
herself to a dog, her daughter gets cured.
Who needs a messiah that calls him a dog because he is not Jewish?
The "good news" was only intended for the Jews, and not for the non-Jewish
world. When Jesus sent out his disciples he specifically told them: "Go
not
into the way of the gentiles, and into any city of the Samaritans enter ye
not: But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel." Matthew
10:5-6.-
------ So this is Jesus' outlook upon the non-Jewish world.
........Please don't think for one moment that this is the official Jewish
outlook upon the non-Jewish world. In the Talmud (this is the codification
of the oral law that expands the written law) tractate Avos 4:3, Rabbi Ben
Azzai, who lived at the same time as Jesus, says: "Do not despise any
man."
In tractate Sanhedrin 13 of the Talmud it is stated: "The righteous of all
nations have a share in the world to come." The Rabbis saw G.d's love as
available to all people, not only to Jews.
According to Jesus, the "dogs" (the non-Jews), must be satisfied with the
crumbs that fall of the table. Now compare this narrow minded view with
the
opinion of the Rabbis who Jesus hated so much and cursed so many times:
Talmud Gittin 61a: "We are obligated to feed the non-Jewish poor in
exactly
the same way as we feed the Jewish poor."
It is written at least three times in the Talmud, Baba Kama 38a, Avoda
Zorah
3, and in Sanhedrin 59, that a non-Jew who studies Torah (the passages
that
apply to him) is equal to a high priest.
King Solomon put it into words in his prayer for the inauguration of the
Temple in this way: "Moreover, concerning a stranger that is not of your
people Israel, but comes out of a far country for your names' sake, for
they
shall hear of your great name and of your strong hand, and of your
outstretched arm, when he shall come towards this house; Hear You in
heaven
your dwelling place and do according all that the stranger calls to You
for,
that all the people of the earth may know your name to fear you, as do
your
people Israel." II Chronicles 6:32-33.
..
..
..
6. Jesus' message of love and peace.
..
..
........Most people think that Jesus was the inventor of high moral
teachings
like "You shall love your neighbor like yourself" and "If somebody hits
you
on one cheek, turn the other cheek" However, he was just quoting the
Jewish
teachings. In the Torah, given by G.d to the Jewish people, it is written
in
Leviticus 19:18: "You shall not avenge, nor bear any grudge against the
children of your people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself." -
-----Look what is written in Lamentations 3:30: "He giveth his cheek to
the
one that smiteth him." So these teachings are not coming from Jesus, but
from Judaism.
Jesus says: "Love your enemies". Judaism says: "If you meet your enemy's
ass
or ox, going astray, you shall surely bring it back to him again. If you
see
the ass of him that hateth you lying under his burden, and wouldest
forbear
to help him, you shall surely help him." Exodus 23:4-5.
Jesus says: "You have heard that it has been said: you shall love your
neighbour and hate your enemy." Matthew 5:43. It is a Jewish commandment
to
love your neighbor, but is absolutely not a Jewish commandment to hate
your
enemy. Instead Judaism says: "If your enemy be hungry, give him bread to
eat, and if he be thirsty give him water to drink, for you shall heap
coals
of fire upon his head, and the LORD (Y-H-W-H) shall reward you." Proverbs
25:21-22. This statement is later used by Paul, in Romans 12:20.
........From this we see that all the high ethical teachings come from
Judaism, therefore we don't need Jesus or Christianity in order to live
according to high moral standards.
And did Jesus himself live up to these standards? He says in Matthew 5:22:
"And whosoever shall say to his brother Raca (a not translated Aramaic
term,
meaning fool) shall be in danger of the council; but whosoever shall say:
You fool, shall be in danger of hellfire." And how does he speak about his
fellow Jews, the Pharisees? He calls them hypocrites (Matthew 23:13),
fools
and blind (idem:17-19), full of all uncleanness (idem:27), and serpents, a
generation of vipers (idem:33). So he did not really live up to his own
teachings, and, according to his own teachings, he brought himself into
danger of hellfire.
And what about turning the other cheek? After his arrest, during his
interrogation, an officer struck him. Did he meekly turn the other cheek?
No. He protested. John 18:22-23 ---The prophet Isaiah however, did give
his
cheeks to his abusers: "I gave my back to the smiters, and my cheeks to
them
that plucked of the hair: I did not hide my face from shame and spitting."
Isaiah 50:6
........Jesus said (Matthew 10:34) "Don't think that I come to send peace
on
the earth, I came not to send peace but a sword." But this is not the
messiah the Jews are waiting for. In the messianic days the wolf and the
lamb must feed together, and the lion shall eat straw like the bullock,
and
dust shall be the serpents meat (Isaiah 65:25). We already have an
abundance
of swords, wars and misery on earth. We don't need a messiah who brings
more
misery.
........Jesus taught not to take revenge but to love your enemy. But when
he
was on the road, hungry, and came to a fig tree and found no figs on it,
he
cursed it and it died right away. Matthew 21:18-19 Is this an attitude of
loving-kindness? In Mark 11:13 we can read that it was not even the season
for figs. What did the poor fig tree do wrong to deserve such a fate?
........In Luke 19:27 Jesus says: "But those mine enemies, which would not
that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me."-
ww-- This surely is a very strange way of loving your enemies. This
statement was a motivation for the crusaders to slaughter many Jewish
communities.
........Another poor example of loving your enemies is John 15:6 : "If a
man
abide not in me, he is cast forth as a branch, and is withered, and man
gather them together and cast them into the fire, and they are burned."---
This terrible statement is later used by the Catholic Church to justify
their practice of burning Jews alive at the stake.
From all this we learn that even for Christ it was difficult to be a good
Christian.
..
..
..
..
7. The present status quo of the Christian churches
..
..
And where are the Christian churches holding that claim to go by the New
Testament?
........The biggest branch, the Roman Catholic Church, is deeply immersed
in
idolatry. G.d says: "Thou shall not make unto thee any graven image nor
any
likeness of anything that is in the heaven above, or in the earth beneath,
or that is in the water under the earth." Exodus 20:4. Please notice that
it
is not only forbidden to wor****p idols, but even making them is forbidden.
However the whole Roman Catholic Church is filled with idols that are
wor****pped by the whole congregation. What does the Bible say about this?
"Their idols are silver and gold, the work of man's hands. They have
mouths,
but they speak not, eyes have they, but they see not, they have ears but
they hear not, noses have they but they smell not. They have hands, but
they
handle not, feet they have, but they walk not, neither speak they through
their throat. They that make them are like unto them. So is everyone that
trusteth in them." Psalms 115:4-8.
........The Protestant churches are doing slightly better in the sense
that
they have no statues which they wor****p, but praying to and wor****ping a
human being, whether dead or alive, man or woman, Jew or non-Jew, is also
idolatry. They think that they are fulfilling a divine commandment when
they
rest on Sunday, the first day of the week. However nowhere in the Old or
New
Testament is it written that anyone should rest on the first day of the
week. As a matter of fact, a non Jew is not commanded to rest on any day
of
the week. The commandment to rest on the Sabbath, the seventh day of the
week, is given by G.d to the Jewish people: "Wherefore the children of
Israel shall keep the Sabbath, to observe the Sabbath throughout their
generations, for a perpetual covenant. It is a sign between Me and the
children of Israel forever." Exodus 31:15-16. A non-Jew is bound by the
covenant that G.d made with Noah; "While the earth remaineth, seedtime and
harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night shall
not cease." Genesis 8:22. Seedtime and harvest shall not cease. G.d did
not
command a day of rest for the Noachide's (non-Jews). Therefore a Noachide
can not stop working on the Sabbath or on any other day, thinking he is
doing that because G.d commanded it to him. Of course he can take a
vacation
and stop working, but he can not do that, thinking he is fulfilling a
Scriptural commandment. What did Jesus, who was a Jew, do in this respect?
Luke 4:16: "And as his custom was, he went to the synagogue on the Sabbath
day." So what is the reason for resting on Sunday? Resting on Sunday is an
invention of the Roman Catholic church, and has no basis in the Scriptures
whatsoever.
The same holds true for Christmas, Easter and other pagan festivals that
the
church adopted. The exact date of birth of Jesus is not given in the New
Testament, but it is very unlikely that it happened in the winter, because
the shepherds were out in the field at night (Luke 2:8-11), and this was
not
the custom in the winter, the rainy season. The pagan tribes that
wor****pped
the sun, used to celebrate on the 25th of December the rebirth of their
god,
the sun. In order to make their conversion to Christianity easier, they
were
allowed to continue celebrating their pagan festivals, but now under a
Christian heading. The Christmas tree is the remainder of another pagan
custom, namely the wor****pping of trees.
........Did you ever wonder where the name Easter is coming from? Look in
the
MacMillan Contem****ary Dictionary: "From Eastre, the Teutonic goddess of
the
dawn, whose rites were also observed in the spring."--- The Easter eggs
and
bunny are pagan fertility symbols.
wwwFrom this we see that the Christian churches are immersed in paganism
and
idolatry, and follow customs and celebrate festivals that have nothing to
do
with either the Old or the New Testament.
How can anybody expect a G.d fearing Jew to become a Christian?
........The Christian churches believe in the theory that G.d rejected His
chosen people, and that instead the Christians are the new spiritual
Israel.
However, G.d says clearly in the Holy Torah that He will never break his
covenant with the Jewish people, even not when they stray away from Him.
When the Jews go astray G.d will punish them. (Leviticus 26:14-17) And if
they then still don't listen, G.d will punish them seven times harder.
(idem:18-22) And if they then still don't listen, G.d will punish them
another seven times harder. (idem:23-24) And if they then still refuse to
turn back to G.d, He will punish them another seven times harder.
(idem:27-28) But despite all this, G.d will not break His covenant with
the
Jewish people: Leviticus 26:44-45; "And yet for all that, I will not cast
them away, neither will I abhor them, to destroy them utterly, and to
break
My covenant with them: For I am Y-H-W-H their G.d. But I will for their
sakes remember the covenant of their ancestors, whom I brought forth out
of
the land of Egypt in the sight of the heathen, that I might be their G.d:
I
am Y-H-W-H."
www"Considerest thou not what this people have spoken, saying: The two
families that the LORD hath chosen, He has even cast them of? Thus they
have
despised My people, that they should no more be a nation before them. Thus
saith the LORD: If My covenant be not with day and night, and if I have
not
appointed the ordinances of heaven and earth; Then will I cast away the
seed
of Jacob and David my servant, so that I will not take any of his seed to
be
rulers over the seed of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob: for I will cause their
captivety to return and have mercy on them." Jeremiah 33:24-26
........If G.d rejected the Jews, why then is He now fulfilling the
prophecies that He will gather in the Jews and bring them back to their
land? "Fear not, for I am with thee, I will bring thy seed from the east,
and gather thee from the west. I will say to the north; give up, and to
the
south; keep not back: Bring my sons from far, and My daughters from the
ends
of the earth." Isaiah 43:5+6 The whole world witnesses this miracle, how
after almost 2000 years of dispersion over the whole earth the Jews are
returning to Israel. In just 50 years a state has been built from scratch,
the Hebrew language has been revived. Is there any precedent in history
for
this? Is there any other people that was dispersed throughout the whole
world for almost 2000 years that held on to their identity and their
religion?---Surely we see here the hand of G.d. However, this is not the
final ingathering of Jews, that is to be done by the messiah. The final
ingathering will be after the war of Gog from Magog with Israel. This is
described by the prophet Ezekiel, in Ezekiel 38 and 39. Please read these
two chapters in order to get a good overview of this. Ezekiel 38:8; "In
the
latter years thou shall come into the land that is brought back from the
sword, and is gathered out of many people, against the mountains of
Israel."
Here it is prophesied that Gog will attack Israel, a land that is brought
out of many nations. We see now that the Jews from the whole world are
coming home. The Jews are coming from Africa, America, all the European
countries have given their share of Jews, we have had mass immigration
from
Russia, the Jews are coming home from all over the world. But, the final
complete ingathering of the Jews will be after the war of Gog from Magog
with Israel. This war and G.d's terrible punishment upon Gog are described
in the latter part of chapter 38 and the beginning of chapter 39. And
after
that it is written in chapter 39, verse 25: "Therefore, thus saith the
LORD
G.d: now I will bring back the captivity of Jacob, and have mercy on the
whole house of Israel. " So the final complete ingathering will be later.
Why is Gog attacking Israel? Ezekiel 38:12: "To take spoil and to take a
prey". idem verse 13: "Art thou come to take spoil? Hast thou gathered thy
company to take a prey? To carry away silver and gold? To take away cattle
and goods, to take a great spoil?" Here we see that the attack is in order
to carry away large amounts of riches that have ac***ulated in Israel.
Fifty
years ago the state of Israel started with less than 500,000 people in a
piece of desolated desert, with no natural resources whatsoever. On the
contrary; even water is a problem. It was attacked right away by fifty
million Arab neighbors, yet by a miracle it survived. The state was faced
with major problems, like constant terrorism from hostile neighbors and
full-blown wars. Israel has to spend enormous amounts of money for defense
in order to survive. Israel has been faced with mass immigration. For
instance, since '89 almost a million Russian immigrants arrived, which is
an
enormous strain upon such a small nation. But nevertheless, what is the
result? Israel has a level of prosperity comparable to many western
countries. Israel has joined the twenty richest countries in the world,
and
financial experts think that Israel is fast on its way to the top. Surely
the blessings of G.d are worth much more than an abundance of oil or gold
mines.
You may think to yourself: But there are 1,000,000,000 Christians, they
cannot all be wrong?
But then, what about the 1,000,000,000 Muslims, aren't they all wrong?
Maybe the question arises: If you can prove, in a small paper like this,
that the New Testament is unreliable and leads to idolatry, then how is it
possible that for 2000 years all the Christians never recognized this
fact? --
----In order to understand this, we must realize that for almost 16
centuries the Bible was not available to the common people. Only in the
middle of the 15th century was the technology to print books invented.
Before that time every copy had to be written by hand, which made it very
expensive, and absolutely unaffordable for the common people. After the
invention of the printing press the Bible was almost exclusively printed
in
Latin, so that it could not be understood by the layman, but only by the
clergy. The Roman Catholic Church did not want the Bible to be available
to
the common people, because they were afraid that when the people could
read
the Bible themselves, they would realize how they were cheated, and stray
away from the mother-church. This was a justified fear, because as soon as
the Bible became available to the m*****, a major Christian reform
movement
arose. Hence the church used all means available to prevent Bible
translations from reaching the common people. ...
----..The first translation of the whole Bible into a spoken language was
into English, made by John Wycliff in 1380. But the church was not as
grateful as you would expect. Forty-three years after his death, in 1428,
his bones were dug up and burned at the stake, by command of the synod of
Constance. Pope Martin V personally confirmed this order.
In 1525 William Tyndale gave the English people his translation of the New
Testament, and later of parts of the Old Testament.
On the sixth of October 1536 he was strangled to death, and afterwards
burned at the stake in Vilvorde near Brussels.WW
Luther, who translated the Bible into German, was excommunicated by the
church, a punishment that carried the death penalty on it, but died a
natural death before the church could get its hands on him.
........In 1527 the Antwerp edition of Tyndale's New Testament was burned
at
St. Paul's Cross, London, and a little later mass burning of these works
and
the works of other translators began. (These facts and dates can easily be
verified by means of the New Catholic Encyclopedia, by an editorial staff
at
the Catholic University of America, Wa****ngton, or through the Oxford
Dictionary of the Christian Church, by Cross and Livingstone.)
-------Later, when translations became widely available, the translations
were usually corrupted at critical points, as shown before.
........The Roman Catholic Church was not very patient with dissidents.
The
Jewish people suffered immensely under the church. They were subject to
discrimination, stashed away in ghettos, they were de****ted, they were
tortured, they were killed. Under these cir***stances reaching out to the
nations and telling them that their religion is a fraud, was for the Jews
tantamount to suicide. .But now the time is right for the truth to come
out.
.........It is very simple and very clear: There is one G.d, and that one
G.d
is one. Give up your idol wor****p and turn to the one true G.d. Do you
want
to be amongst those of whom the prophet Jeremiah says: "The gentiles shall
come unto thee from the ends of the earth and shall say: Surely our
fathers
have inherited lies, vanity, and things wherein there is no profit."
Jeremiah 16:19.
-------Wait for the true messiah who will bring peace and prosperity to
the
whole world in his first attempt.
-------"And the LORD (Y-H-W-H) shall be king over all the earth; in that
day
shall there be one LORD (Y-H-W-H) and His name One." Zechariah 14:9.`
-------"Thus saith the LORD of hosts: In those days it shall come to pass
that ten men shall take hold out of all the languages of the nations, even
shall take hold of the skirt of him that is a Jew, saying: We will go with
you, for we have heard that G.d is with you." Zechariah 8:23.
What does this all mean? Does everybody have to forsake his religion and
embrace Judaism?
This is not necessary. Although anyone who is driven by the right motives
can become Jewish and join the Jewish people, this is not a necessity in
order to enter heaven. Noah was not Jewish, but nevertheless it is written
about him in Genesis 6:9: "Noah was a just man and perfect in his
generations." And what was his reward? "And Noah walked with G.d." The
same
holds true for Job. He was also not Jewish. "Job was perfect and upright,
and one that eschewed evil." Job 1:1. So you don't have to be Jewish in
order to be a G.d fearing and righteous person. The Jewish people have a
different mission in life: "And you shall be unto Me a kingdom of priests,
a
holy nation." Exodus 19:6. For this reason the Jewish people have to live
according to 613 commandments. For the Noachide (non-Jew), life is a lot
easier; he has far fewer commandments. Seven of them are particularly
notable, because if he transgresses them, he will be punished by a human
court. These are:
1) Establish courts of law.
2) Do not murder
3) Do not wor****p idols
4) Do not blaspheme
5) Do not steal.
6) Do not commit adultery
7) Do not eat the limbs of a live animal.
These seven are the minimum that a Noachide must fulfill. All together
there
are about 30 commandments that a Noachide must fulfill. He is obligated to
do everything that has to do with the understanding of the heart, but if
he
transgresses these, he will not be punished for it by a human court. If
you
want to go deeper into these laws, the following books are recommended:
The Seven Laws of Noah, by Jacob Joseph, School Press. 1981 New York.
The Path of the Righteous Gentile, Targum Press, Southfield 1987.
The International Lubavitch Organization, headquartered in Brooklyn, New
York, is also active in informing non-Jews of their G.d given code of law.
There is also a possibility that there is in your neighborhood a B'nai
No'ach (Sons of Noah) movement.
........In the Temple times non-Jews living in Israel and observing these
seven universal laws, were permitted to offer sacrifices in the Temple.
Because of the constant persecution that has befallen the Jews since the
destruction of the Temple, it was not possible to teach these laws to the
world. But now G.d is bringing the Jewish people home, and the Jewish
people
can once again reach out to the nations of the world and teach them G.d's
laws.
----"For out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the LORD
(Y-H-W-H) from Jerusalem." Isaiah 2:3, Micha 4:2
In the Midra****c literature a Rabbi declares: (Tana De Bei Eliyahu
Rabba)--"
I call heaven and earth as witnesses: Any individual, whether Jew or
non-Jew, man or woman, servant or maid, can bring the Divine Presence upon
himself, in accordance with his deeds."
Keep the seven, go to heaven!
........Look what happened when mankind abandoned these laws: "And G.d
looked
upon the earth and behold, it was corrupt, for all the flesh had corrupted
its way upon the earth. And G.d said unto Noah: The end of all flesh is
come
before Me for the earth is filled with violence through them, and behold;
I
will destroy them with the earth." Genesis 6:12-13.
........"Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear G.d and keep
his commandments, for this is the whole duty of man. For G.d shall bring
every matter into judgement, with every secret thing, whether it be good
or
whether it be evil." Ecclesiastis 12:13-14.
........Let us hope and pray that the real Messiah may come speedily, in
our
days, and that the third everlasting Temple shall be build rapidly.
"For my house shall be called a house of prayer for all people." Isaiah
56:7.
*.........*.........*
..
..
For answers to frequently asked questions click here
When you want to take a closer look at the 'prophecies' that are claimed
to
point forward to Jesus, then click here
If you wonder why the holocaust happened, click here
When you want to comment on this article on our message board, click here
For more about the authors of this article click here
Wanneer u dit artikel in het nederlands wil lezen, klik hier
The writer of this article can be contacted through
Eliyahu@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"From Zion shall come forth the law, and the word of G.d from Jerusalem."
....Isaiah 2:3, ...Micah 4:2
|
