Re: While we can not see God

>> "You cannot see  'Him'  because 'He' is simply a figment of human
>> imagination.
>>
>> Prove me wrong"
>>
>> We can not see love because it is a figment of our imagination.
>>
>> Prove me wrong.
>
>So your god is simply 'love' and not the  one which created the
>universe?  now which one is it?  let us have a little rationalisation
>around here

Smile, no assertion made either way about universe, simply making a 
point that we accept many things based on what we can not directly 
"prove", including love.

>>

>All you prove is your ability to be a chronic LIAR

How so?  Do you suggest that it is a lie we gave you a chance by logic
and "proof" to confirm your ideas about the divine previously and in 
each attempt you failed?

>Do you expect us for one moment to believe that had you evidence for
>the existence of your 'Lord' you would not be shouting it from the
>rooftops?

In your previous attempts you began by asserting the absence of the
divine citing "common sense" and "logic".  When examined in greater
detail you were unable to sustain the assertion.


>all we get is deathly silence

Given I have always maintained that the divine can not by "common sense"
nor "logic" be known but only by accepting a revelation of same, the
above is a red herring and irrelevant.

>> you failed in each
>> attempt as you could not bring logic and evidence to bear upon the
>> question of the divine.  Why should we do it all again?
>
>Lieing for god again are we?  How disgusting

No, see above.