Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Religion > Bible Talk > Re: The Trinity
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 5 of 10 Topic 12854 of 13502
Post > Topic >>

Re: The Trinity

by roymock@[EMAIL PROTECTED] May 12, 2008 at 01:37 AM

On May 12, 5:49 pm, "Chuck Stamford" <shell__stamf...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Carl" <sai...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
news:3048b31e-6a11-4c3e-8c18-46b8e59e8cc1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On May 12, 2:20 am, roym...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>
>
>
> > On May 12, 3:29 pm, "Carl" <sai...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > James Boyce originally wrote this over 100 years ago but his points
> > > concerning the Biblically-based doctrine of the Trinity remain just
as
> > > valid
> > > now as they did then. It's an interesting and educational look into
an
> > > essential Biblical doctrine. I hope you will save this article and
read
> > > it
> > > carefully.
>
> > > May God bless,
> > > Carl
> > > website --http://www.nettally.com/saints/
> > > blog --http://www.anniemayhem.com/cgi-bin/wordpress/
>
> > When he says "... he [Christ] being indeed the manifestation in the
> > world, of the divine Father ... " or "... He [Christ] is the
> > manifestation of the Divine Being in this world ...", I take it that
> > Boyce had modalistic tendencies.
>
> Actually, no. He did not.

I quoted directly from the piece presented.

> If you care to, you can read biographical information on him at:
>
> http://www.theopedia.com/James_Petigru_Boyce
>
> Chuck:
>
> Perhaps more im****tantly is the link at the bottom of the page to which
this
> link points...
>
> http://www.founders.org/library/boyce1/toc.html
>
> which itself leads to the online version of his "Abstract of Systematic
> Theology", the resource, I assume, you used for "Chapter XIV: The
Trinity",
> of that same work.
>
> God bless
>
> Chuck Stamford
>
> http://www.founders.org/journal/fj19/article4.html
>
> http://www.tlogical.net/biojboyce.htm

Thanks, Chuck.

In your last link he wrote "... The revelation to us, is not that of
tritheism or three Gods; nor of triplicity, which is threefoldness,
and would involve composition, and be contrary to the simplicity of
God; nor of mere manifestation of one person in three forms".  Clearly
he was far from modalism.

Cheers






>
> May God bless,
> Carl
> website --http://www.nettally.com/saints/
> blog --http://www.anniemayhem.com/cgi-bin/wordpress/
 




 10 Posts in Topic:
The Trinity
"Carl" <sain  2008-05-12 01:29:15 
Re: The Trinity
roymock@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-11 23:20:52 
Re: The Trinity
Carl <saints@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-12 00:21:17 
Re: The Trinity
"Chuck Stamford"  2008-05-12 00:49:59 
Re: The Trinity
roymock@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-12 01:37:13 
Re: The Trinity
"Chuck Stamford"  2008-05-12 17:40:09 
Re: The Trinity
Carl <saints@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-12 09:54:22 
Re: The Trinity
"Chuck Stamford"  2008-05-12 17:41:58 
Re: The Trinity
Carl <saints@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-12 09:57:06 
Re: The Trinity
Carl <saints@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-12 19:19:24 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan13V112 Fri Jul 25 16:35:33 CDT 2008.