Re: Who do you trust? Carl or bible bob?

On Sat, 10 May 2008 20:03:04 -0500, Rod <icom706@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>NOSPAM wrote:
>> On Sat, 10 May 2008 14:21:00 -0500, Rod <icom706@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> 
>>>   The way I see it, if you cry wolf enough times
>>>   people will fail to heed your call, and when your
>>>   lying mouth gets you into something you can't get
>>>   out of I'll happily get to read about in the
>>>   papers ! And the beauty of it is that I don't have
>>>   to have any part of it at all, I just have to wait
>>>   until you screw yourself over.
>>>
>>>   And it will happen...it always does with nuts like
>>>   you...you are always having some kind of crisis...
>> 
>> What about YOURE LIES concerning me, Rod?
>
>   Excuse me, but what I said was already spread on another network
>   by someone that evidently has been mistreated by you, or hates you.
>
You're lying, as usual.

>   I repeated it, I didn't create it. it wouldn't surprise me to find
>   that it was someone that is, or has been here, but in any case you 
>didn't like it, did you ? I didn't think you would. Thats how you have 
>left us feeling. Nice feeling, isn't it ? I won't take it for granted 
>that anyone here is willing to change things after seeing things like 
>this, most here can care less as they have proved this week and in the
>past year.
>
Bollocks.
You made it all up.
 You sad, sorry case.. get some professional help before it's too
late.
>
>> You  claimed  I had a
>> supposed illicit affair with a medical doctor - untrue;
>> you claimed I 'killed some patients', and in fact, ASKED if I had
>> 'killed any more' -- then the latest crappola was that 'watcher' was
>> supposedly 'me'....... so what CRISIS are you having?
>
>   None. I gave you a sample of what you've given John. I've also given 
>you the benefit of doubt as far as forging posts has gone and taken your
>word that it isn't you. Now I'm telling YOU, I haven't forged anyones
>posts, and Kelly hasn't bothered to provide proof of it. And you called
>me a turncoat for treating John like a human being, but what really 
>pissed you off is when he made his accusation and I responded by asking 
>you if it's the truth ! Your response shocked me, but I haven't brought
>myself to believe the accusation, nor heard your side of it. You however
>were ready and willing to believe that I forged some posts on the word 
>of a chronic liar.
>
>   I have that liar blocked AGAIN, but she alters her nym and claims that
>she doesn't do it to avoid filters. What fool other than her believes
that ?