Re: Popular Excuses To Avoid Salvation

On May 11, 10:32 am, "Chuck Stamford" <shell__stamf...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> "Carl" <sai...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> news:8bfd8f12-712e-4dd6-9b83-b3382ec57bed@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On May 11, 1:28 am, "Mike Painter" <mddotpain...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > Carl wrote:
> > > Straw man.
>
> > Publi****ng definitions without actually answering any of the arguments
is
> > meaningless.
>
> Making straw man arguments is meaningless and deserves no response.
>
> Chuck:
>
> Man's got a point, Mike.
>
> Chuck Stamford

JERRY
Uh, no he doesn't.  As I responded to Carl, anyone can yell "STRAWMAN"
but if you aren't prepared to show why my statement is the strawman
logical fallacy, the best I can figure is that Carl doesn't understand
the fallacy and is simply pulling it out of his fourth point of
contact.

In fact, I responded to the text of the sermon Carl posted.  I used
the text and argued why it wasn't valid.  If Carl thinks I set up a
straw man argument, then it's in***bent upon Carl to answer why he
thinks my argument is that logical fallacy.

I would do it for you.  For that matter, I have done and will continue
to do it for Carl.