You clearly ignored everything I just said. I am simply targeting
conseptual evolution. DNA does not create life, the human body creates
life. DNA is a code. I am claiming that evolution is mathematically
impossible. Starting with a one celled organism you can't create a
million
celled organism without adding a massive amount of energy. Scientists
don't
make any attempt to explain how energy is added into the organism. Be
carefull when you respond to me this is not an argument you have heard
before.
DNA=>MAGICAL GROWTH=>BRAIN
I am simply saying that evolutionists ignore the fact that creatures
become
more complex over time.
This has to be explained. Usually things decay or devolve (slow down,
loose
energy) so if a theory is using evolution then conceptual evolution has to
be explained. Scientists make no attempt to explain this.
In laymans terms you can't create a robot with Visual Basic, get
it!!!!!!!!!?
It takes more energy to make more complex designs therefore energy has to
be
added into the organism.
The reason why is because energy has to flow in a straight line therefore
if
you want the energy to make a pattern like the human brain, you need a
"wall" for the energy to bounce off of. Therefore the wall will have to be
more complex than the pattern you are trying to create, simple
mathematics.
Energy won't change direction if it does not have a complex physical
patterns to bounce off.
Currently evolutionists are attempting to create robots with Visual Basic
and these robots create more complex robots using the same Visual Basic.
Scientists are completely, completely ignoring the physical aspect of
creation. Robots have to be created then programmed, simple script is not
strong enough to physically create life. There is a major hurtle that
stands between DNA and the creation of a human cell. Also that same
hurtle
is between one cell and a more complex cell. At no point in mathematical
reality will a physical "wall" pattern create a more complex pattern.
Therefore cells can't ever give birth to more complex cells.
In super laymans terms you need energy to channel energy like the energy
it
takes to dam a river. Therefore energy can never be increased and the dam
will eventually collapse. Energy can't increase it can only be changed
and
with the changing of energy comes energy loss. Therefore I politely
demand
an explanation for the progress of evolution. Each progressive generation
should be weaker not stronger. This is actually an argument that the
Bible
and most religious people use. We as complex patterns can only have come
from a more complex patterm usually refered to as God. The main debate is
what form does this more complex being take. What exactly do you believe
to
be true?
DNA is a blueprint as the human cell is to a skyscraper. Blueprints
aren't
strong enough to create skyscrapers.
|
